".... After all, blaming the vaccines is a pretty big claim to make..."
The Devil's Advocate: An Exploratory Analysis of 2022 Excess Mortality
Thank you Professor Norman Fenton (British mathematician who is Professor of Risk Information Management at Queen Mary University of London) and Professor Martin Neil (Professor in Computer Science and Statistics at Queen Mary, University of London) for continuing to speaking out and for joining the fight against this terrible usurpation of ethics, science, and compassionate humanity.
I do realise you are playing Devil’s Advocate, which seems a euphemism for taking the side of the Angels. Nonetheless, I was surprised to read what I considered your odd and cautious assertion, notwithstanding the tenor of your post,
".... After all, blaming the vaccines is a pretty big claim to make..."
Perhaps the judicious use of the /rhet or /sarc tag may have been helpful? I would humbly suggest we are far removed from wit, whatever its level of sophistication.
Unsafe and Ineffective
This incontrovertible truth is staring us all in the face. It does so with the fixed and unblinking thousand yard stare of the chilling psychopath. It is as unmistakable as it is terrifying.
So, just to be absolutely clear. The burden of proof for ‘safe and effective’ lies as it always must do with those that perpetrated and doubled down on injecting a larger proportion of humanity with their massive, industrially scaled up, test-lite, synthetic polynucleotide sequence wrapped in an envelope of lipid nano-particles (LNP). The burden of proof is on them to disprove any claim of injury as a consequence of these injections. Denial and data tampering or deletion do not constitute evidence of disproof. Instead, it rather tends to confirm it. When running any experiment, one records all observations and assumes a causal relationship until proved otherwise. That is the nature of the null hypothesis, namely an resultant observation is not a result of some intervention. It is self-evident one also requires suitable control.
The BigDrivers namely, BigGOV, BigBureaucracy, BigMedicine, BigPharma and BigUN/WHO/WEF/CEPI/BC and a host of other institutions and individuals that simply went along to get along remain in full view and refuse to vanish. People are still even chanting “anti-vaxxer” as I personally learned quite inadvertently from someone I once considered a friend who stupidly included me in an office email. Another of their responses is typified by health academic Emily Oster, in her infamous article ‘Let’s Declare a Pandemic Amnesty’, which precipitated a Streisand effect around the repulsive hubris of faux-apology, an obvious hallmark of the pathologically uninsightful.
Controls, Ethics, Consent … Ditched
Please let us remember that scientific, medical, bureaucratic, political and ethical caution and rigour were hurled aside in 2020. The bizarre vacuum was filled, a priori, by psy-ops (the substantive Yale study of James et al. ‘Persuasive messaging to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake intentions’ before any injections were available. The Yale study was huge (Experiment 1 ~ 4,361 participants completed the survey; experiment 2 ~ 5,014 participants were recruited by the vendor YouGov/Polimetrix. Funding for the Yale study remains unknown.
BigPharma was front-loaded with government money, guaranteed huge sales and profits and assured of waivers of liability. The products hardly seem to matter while the wider processes at play appeared critical.
Formal mRNA injection controls were ditched immediately upon EUA, and any pretense of 'science', let alone ethics, going forward became farce in the WHO redefined ‘pandemic’.
Claiming the novel synthetic polynucleotide / LNP injections had utility appeared most uncertain from the outset. It was inconveniently stated in an early comparative study by Bliden et al. (Evolution of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody and IgG Avidity Post Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Vaccinations) that individual response to injection was variable and unpredictable (and by extension, so were any resultant reactogenic and/or adverse event and/or death) that they may have precipitated.
“We did observe highly variable immune responses including those with well below average anti-RBD IgG levels and avidity. It is therefore important to monitor immune responses at the individualized and personalized level, identify those who are still at risk even after vaccination, …”
And let’s also keep in mind synthetic mRNA / LNP injections are not and were never "vaccinations." We have also come to appreciate that the injections neither arrested transmission nor infection.
They have proved to be pointless and injurious.
Meantime, with controls gone with the EUA, "effectiveness" became a black-box modeled circular function of efficacy and the absurd RT-PCR, RAT test data, hospitalisations with/of and death with/of...see UK ONS explanations around “effectiveness” modeling. The models cannot have been validated in the absence of real world control.
Since then Fraiman et al. recently concluded in their study of the Pfizer efficacy data, ‘Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials’ that,
The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization or death.
We already knew (COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant
(not) in the room ~ Olliaro, Torreele, Vaillant ~ Lancet Microbe June 2021) that the absolute risk reduction (ARR) and numbers needed to vaccinate in order to prevent one case (NNV), obvious and more honest indicators of real world effectiveness, were unpredictably trivial in stark contrast to the psy-ops “marketing” chant of 95% relative risk reduction.
Dagan and colleagues (Dagan N, Barda N, Kepten E, et al. BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a nationwide mass vaccination setting. NEJM 2021) reported an RRR of 94%, which is essentially the same as the RRR of the phase 3 trial (95%) but with an ARR of 0·46%, which translates into an NNV of 217 (when the ARR was 0·84% and the NNV was 119 in the phase 3 trial)
A Repeating Temporal Relationship Highlighting Causal Association
The clear and repeating temporal relationship of hospitalisation and death to Pfizer injections and boosters was enough of a smoking canon for me (OECD.stat, excess mortality COVID 2020 - 2022).
Further, the absence of statistical power residing in the initial Pfizer efficacy study appears as inadequate as it was appalling, keeping in mind the goal was to inject hundreds of millions or billions of people. The corporate corruption that materialised around the efficacy study (BMJ Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial), and the FDA delay in their overt attempt at concealment and delay in the release of data was damning and unforgivable (Judge scraps 75-year FDA timeline to release Pfizer vaccine safety data, giving agency eight months).
The six month follow-up by Pfizer (5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) received through 28-FEB-2021) and its 9 page appendix with >1000 events of "special interest" was particularly revealing in its horror of adverse events, reading like a compendium of pathology.
And Now?
So our learned and eminent maths and stats professors of Queen Mary University of London are now reduced to best fit regression analysis, adding to the empirical evidence of the legion of the sudden dead.
I suppose we may eventually see the evil perpetrators answer for their crimes against humanity, but I am beginning to doubt that. They are clearly boxing on relentlessly with their mRNA platform as Jessica makes clear in, ‘In Case You Didn’t Know…’
which brings us back to the ‘The Great Bifurcation’.
The full installation and implementation of the Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) 100 day wonder, the mRNA platform technology, into which variable synthetic polynucleotide sequences may be slotted and mass injections rapidly and recurrently administered was always the commercial goal of CEPI (Disease ‘X’ And The Alchemy Of 100 Days.
CEPI was formed in Davos in Switzerland in 2017 by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the WEF, Wellcome and supported by a line-up of investing and funding countries, which includes New Zealand with its current ‘donation’ running to about NZ$35 million. By the way, any connection with CEPI was explicitly denied by the New Zealand Ministry of Health.
CEPI is enmeshed with the WHO and BigPharma forming a super-conglomerate of ideologues, vested commercial interests, and supra-national corporate globalist power structures.
Excess Mortality ~ A Temporal Relationship To mRNA Injections
OECD.statistics (Left hand drop down menu: Health>COVID 19 Health Indicators>Mortality (by week)>Excess death) provide useful national data on excess deaths. I graphed the results for NZ and inserted the dates of the injection schedules.
One hardly needs to look further and indeed I probably wouldn't were this treated as 'usual clinical practice'. Repetition of challenge leading to repetition of injury/death at the very least leads to the immediate cessation in order to clarify whether an experimental association that must be ethically assumed in the first instance to be causal, is actually causal.
Instead, while emphatically denying the existence of a global, tyrannical, uncontrolled, coercive social and medical experiment that installed, promoted and enforced as routine, a public “health” practice of experimental, novel synthetic gene/LNP injections, the corporate globalist protagonists and their political and medical allies are clearly 'managing' it as a bizarre experiment, post hoc injection by not only imposing an inversion of ethics with the burden of proof of injury residing on those that have been injured, but also a requirement to attain an impossibly high experimental (as opposed to legal) threshold of proof of injury.
The resultant double benefit of this double standard is a massive under-stating and reporting of adverse events and death and the perpetuation of the psy-ops nurtured compulsion with its illusion of "safe and effective." Commercial interests continue to reap their bonanza of ill-gotten gain.
And I haven't even started in on the issues of 'consent' (Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease) or the terrible mess that has been intentionally made of almost all of the 'data', which is exactly why we find ourselves stuck with the telling left-overs of 'excess death' and some histology results from post-mortem examinations (Postmortem investigation of fatalities following vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines).
Was all this intentional? Yes. Absolutely.
Is it insane? Yes, of course. Insanity abounds.
Post Script
".... After all, blaming the vaccines is a pretty big claim to make..."
Excellent commentary on the entire 3 year culling exercise. I quibble only with your final statement that it is insane. I think it is pure , purposeful, calculated evil. The insane are unwell and have an excuse for bad behaviour. These monsters have NO excuse!