Coincidence Or Conspiracy?

'Safety' ... The Oil In The Machinery

In their own words, The Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovation, “(CEPI) is an innovative global partnership between public, private, philanthropic, and civil society organisations launched (with exquisite timing by just the perfect cabal of the right kind of people, countries and corporations) in Davos in 2017 to develop vaccines to stop future epidemics.”

Coincidence or conspiracy?

I’m unsure how one arrests a “future epidemic” without a priori knowledge of the alleged pathogen, but we’ll let that one hang on its own fallacy. The CEO of CEPI however, asserts his unique insight into the solution, “Delivering a vaccine in 100 days against the next Disease X would give the world a fighting chance to extinguish the existential threat of a future pandemic virus.” (We’ll return to that quote in the next newsletter).

100 days … from woe to go in little over 3 months?

Just dwell on that for a moment. The implications are truly terrifying. The experimental platform technology granted emergency use authorization is already here. Synthetic polynucleotide (gene) sequences and their enveloping cocktail of lipid nanoparticles accompanied by worrisome adjuvants (an immunological agent that increases the antigenic response) and other troublesome excipient substances (PEG) are clearly intended by BigGov, BigPharma, and BigMoney to stay.

All poised and ready to go; just a tweaked gene sequence between “pandemics.”

The infamous double-benefit is on display.

Tyrannies gravitate to the efficiency of killing two birds with one stone. They favour multiple benefits for one hit. For example, redefine carbon dioxide, a vital atmospheric trace gas and plant fertilizer as a '“pollutant” and cash in on the policy. Chant ‘safe and effective’ against a phantasmagoric disease, rope in partners and investors at the end of punitive contracts, eradicate liability while elevating media censorship and propaganda to routine practice and you’ll pull in a cool US$22B in the 2021 financial year.

Investors and Partners

As I already mentioned, CEPI was founded in Davos in 2017 with an exquisite timing that only the private jet-setting gilded elite possess. The governments of Norway and India, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome, and the World Economic Forum were founders.

On their web site, CEPI proudly announce their Investors and Partners. This line-up of countries, corporations, BigGov and BigPharma continuing to provide financial support: “To date, CEPI has secured financial support from Australia, Austria, Belgium, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Canada, Denmark, the European Commission, Ethiopia, Finland, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Singapore, Switzerland, The Republic of Korea, United Kingdom, USAID, and Wellcome.”

“Additionally, CEPI has also received support from private sector entities as well as public contributions through the UN Foundation COVID-19 Solidarity Response Fund.”

And,

“Close collaboration with our partners is crucial for the success of our work.”

I just bet it is.

But Not Us

Not everyone seems keen to acknowledge their association with CEPI. For example, the The New Zealand Ministry of Health in response to the question made under the Official Information Act (8 November 2021; ref.H202115700):

Please explicitly state the commercial and legal contractual relationship defined by the words, 'Investors and Partners' that exists between the New Zealand government and The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) embracing but not limited to the domains of public health, medical policy and practice, scientific research, vaccine safety and ministerial obligations.

The New Zealand Ministry of Health replied:

The Ministry of Health does not have a relationship with the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation. Therefore, the above parts of your request are refused under section 18(g)(i) of the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act)  as the information requested is not held by the Ministry and there are no grounds for believing it is held by another agency subject to the Act.

The Official Website for the New Zealand Government possesses multiple entries virtue signalling more than NZ$30 million invested in CEPI.

It begs another question.

Is the New Zealand Ministry of Health so entirely disconnected from reality?

The Accelerator … Remember 100 days

CEPI holds hands tightly with GAVI (The Vaccine Alliance) whose ‘partnership’ model relies on the ubiquitous Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank, the WHO (World Health Organisation) and UNICEF (United Nations Children's Fund). The CEPI / GAVI union has spawned COVAX, the self-described the vaccines pillar of the Access to COVID-19 Tools (ACT) Accelerator, which accelerates the novel vaccines project toward the objective of the 100 day goal referred to earlier. Apparently, “Supporting the ACT-Accelerator is a global health, moral, economic and security imperative.”

The funding line-up possesses the anticipated players in the background, but this time it also includes a plethora of nations led by Germany. New Zealand is shown to provide the same amount as the CCP in China, 0.3% ~ NZ$26.8M ~ (US$16.8M) of the US$5.6 Billion. Germany and the UK are the largest nation providers by a country mile.

Safety, The Oil In The Corporate Machinery

Ensuring the smooth and continued operation of The Access to COVID Tools or ACT-A Transition into the future (beyond September 2022) the over-arching goal of 100 day delivery and implementation must be well greased with safety.

The Brighton Collaboration (BC) oversees safety.

The history of this safety organisation from its altruistic origin in 1999 to its current conflicted state appears an epic example of regressive subversion. It is a fascinating pathway right up to the part it was finally swallowed up as a program of the Task Force for Global Health. No surprises here. This organisation is funded by that scintillating and repetitive line-up of the usual suspects, including CEPI, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, US CDC, WHO and BigPharma (Pfizer, Wellcome et al.).

Conflicts of interest? Independent safety platform?

Summary

In a nutshell then, the funders, partners, investors, developers, manufacturers, safety guarantors, providers, distributors, mandating governments and authorities, general practitioners, nurses, department store and pharmacy ‘vaccinators’ are all in on what may be described as a monstrous and incestuous bonanza of cash and on-going extravaganza of novel intervention.

And while the money thunders in under the banner of ‘safe and effective’, the synthetic gene ‘product’ with its terrible track record, unpredictable Absolute Risk Reduction of 0·46%, translating into an Numbers Needed to Vaccinate of 217 and negative risk benefit, increasingly confirmed as unsafe and ineffective, continues to remain a treasured diamond of government policy and its mandated jabs for health professionals in New Zealand.

From Very The Beginning

Anyone following fairly closely may well have seen the: Consensus summary report for CEPI / BC March 12–13, 2020 meeting: ‘Assessment of risk of disease enhancement with COVID-19 vaccines’ (Consensus Report), published in Vaccine on May 25, 2020, in advent of the Gullible Re-Set.

It makes astonishing reading, appearing particularly poignant in retrospect.

For example: At Section 5.2. Preserving neutralization sensitive epitopes on spike proteins, Dr Barney Graham, MD PhD, Deputy Director of the NIH Vaccine Research Center acknowledged, “Of course, disadvantages include the novel nature of both mRNA and DNA vaccines without any licensed vaccine with either technology to date and lack of experience for mass production.”

Nevertheless a scant 7 months after the publication of the CEPI / BC Consensus Report, The UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) became the first medicines regulator to authorize the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA/lipid nanoparticle product for widespread use on December 2nd, 2020.

Thinking that this accelerated development, massive industrially scaled manufacture and distribution was un-Godly, you’d be right.

‘Un-Godly’, ‘unprecedented’ do actually seem the correct adjectives to apply here, but how about considering an alternative less emotive interpretation such as, a priori ‘preparedness’? After all, CEPI the newly created institutional doyen of ‘Epidemic Preparedness Innovations’ had approximately 3 years to prepare for its first manifestation of purpose.

The Consensus Report focus on the issue of vaccine associated enhanced disease (VAED) acknowledged, “A syndrome of "disease enhancement" has been reported in the past for a few viral vaccines where those immunized suffered increased severity or death when they later encountered the virus or were found to have an increased frequency of infection.”

Little wonder than that partnering and investing governments purchased multiple shots in the bizarre imbroglio of politically fueled policy, commercial interest, and the pervasive creep of tyranny explicit in the dawning Gullible Re-Set. An increased frequency of infection is a great imperative. We have surely witnessed that in communities of the multiply jabbed. The extraordinary range in the purchase of novel shots across countries also attests to this, for example, Canada at 11 shots per capita, and New Zealand at 6 shots per capita. Science? No. Commerce, coercion, political opportunism, seem more likely

The flagrant culpability shouts to be recognized.

Well Displayed Circularity

The Consensus Report states:

“These considerations are not of a regulatory nature and cannot in any sense replace the need for proper regulatory consultations on the requirements for vaccines clinical trials. Vaccine developers are therefore encouraged to seek individual scientific advice from regulatory authorities.”

The US CDC is listed as a funder of the safety platform BC, a program of the Task Force for Global Health together with CEPI, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, WHO and BigPharma (Pfizer, Wellcome et al.). The spinning circularity of conflicted interests is as obvious as it is mind bending. Regulatory authorities appear highly unlikely to be capable of offering unbaised scientific and medical views, a fact that is now self-evident.

A following statement in the Consensus Report further serves to illustrate emergent bias from health authorities. Here the Report identifies the role of cross-immunity:

‘Understanding the role cross-reacting antibodies from prior coronavirus infections may have on natural disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 or if they influence the risk of enhanced disease following vaccination may inform vaccine design’.

On September 17, 2020, the BMJ published an article by associate editor Dr Peter Doshi:

Covid-19: Do many people have pre-existing immunity?

At least six studies have reported T cell reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 in 20% to 50% of people with no known exposure to the virus.

A few days later, September 23, 2020 the following report in the HuffPost stated:

Fauci Shuts Down False Rand Paul Claims About Coronavirus, Herd Immunity

‘Sen. Paul went on to suggest that there may be people out there, about one-third of the population, that have “pre-existing immunity” to COVID-19. This idea is based on these people having what are called cross-reactive antibodies after successfully fighting similar viruses’.

‘Fauci shot that suggestion down too’.

Media spin and Dr Fauci denied cross-immunity while remaining a consistent and vigorous promoter of novel injections and engaged every-which-way to maximize their deployment. Bias was explicit.

The Phantom Of Disease Enhancement ~ Go, No Go.

The Consensus Report concludes in the following way, demonstrating that even knowing that disease enhancement was inevitable it did not represent a ‘no-go’ signal. Of course it didn’t. The CEPI / GAVI conglomerate corporate monster was en route to a multibillion dollar return and possessed an unstoppable momentum fueled by an up-front, commercial risk mitigating fount of government money.

The group of Experts considers that the demonstration of some disease enhancement with any candidate vaccine after viral challenge in animal models should not necessarily represent a no-go signal for deciding whether to progress into early trials in clinical development of a COVID-19 vaccine.

Continuous monitoring of this risk during clinical trials in an epidemic context will be needed.

‘Continuous monitoring’ … laughable nonsense ... Why?

What Is Being Missed?

What is being missed here is the existence of an established fundamental inability to identify vaccine associated enhanced disease (VAED), as the authors of Vaccine-associated enhanced disease: Case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data (funded by CEPI) stated for the Brighton Collaboration Vaccine-associated Enhanced Disease Working Group.

They wrote:

“No single or combination of specific confirmatory tests is available to diagnose VAED. As the clinical manifestations of VAED lies within the spectrum of natural disease – occurring more frequently and / or severely in vaccinated individuals – it is also difficult to separate vaccine failure (also called breakthrough disease) from VAED in vaccinated individuals.”

The presence VAED, also described euphemistically as a “breakthrough” case is a very serious concern that is ignored / censored by health authorities and media because it may interfere with their spurious justification for further “boosters.” The goal unquestionable appears to entrench the future in an endless litany of injections, subject individuals to this requirement, record their compliance and penalize them potentially into submission.

The obvious is clear. The purchase of multiple shots a priori confirms that the medical authorities and government understood the warning conveyed in the Consensus Report: ‘…where those immunized suffered increased severity or death when they later encountered the virus or were found to have an increased frequency of infection.”

And yet, astonishingly the…

New Zealand Health Authority Denies Existence of VAED

Under the Official Information Act on 8 November 2021 (ref.H202115700) the following question was posed to the NZ Ministry of Health.

The acknowledged established (unpredictable) risk of disease enhancement is not a highlighted feature of the New Zealand government consent process to an mRNA injection recipient. Given large numbers of the population have been double injected, and community transmission is in its early days, what steps are being taken to identify, mitigate, manage, treat and support the societal scale unpredictable risk of a serious or lethal disease enhancement reaction in those hitherto unexposed to the SARSCoV-2 virus who have received the double Pfizer injections? How will such a potential reaction be differentiated from 'break through' cases?

The NZ Ministry of Health, who as you may recall denied any connection with CEPI, replied:

Disease enhancement has not been observed in response to COVID-19 vaccination.

The New Zealand Ministry of Health appears to have failed to read the Consensus Report. Neither does it explain why, even before COVID manifest in the population of the country, it purchased 6 jabs per capita (or for that matter why Canada purchased 11 jabs), and most especially, in light of the following post at NZDSOS.com

VAED, Long Covid and Hospitalisations, all From a Fly-Weight; Really? Let’s Take a Closer Look.

I don’t anticipate an answer.

Post Script

A Great Awakening impelled by the modus operandi of the Gullible Re-Set is now upon us.

It is obvious that actions must eventually arise to supplant words.