How Uncertainty Begets Certainty
When Politicians And Bureaucrats Depict Certainty
Above, State Propaganda arm RNZ News depict smiling certainty and confidence behind the pantomime of virtue signalling, de rigueur masks and appropriate separation (or is it ethical sedation?), while expressionless and masked Andrew Narayan, ‘the doctor’ presides from an elevated distance. It begs the question, should he now be appropriately addressed as ‘Dr WHO’?
“Never mind,” as they say in New Zealand, censor, shut down and lock up dissent. While it begs the question once again, would these visible political figureheads expose themselves to the gigantic political risk of a spectacular though common enough adverse event of many, for conditions that merit no attention at their age, and in their scintillating and pulchritudinous media condition?
Meanwhile, Concrete Certainty Also Prevails Elsewhere
Cleveland Clinic ~ ineffectiveness of bivalents and boosters;
How the Endless Boosters Will Destroy Immune Function
Political Certainty = Controlled Uncertainty
Being in an uncontrolled ‘experiment’ (an oxymoron were there ever one in addition to the obvious, there is no ethics in existence for uncontrolled experiments on people), the incipient status of the hapless participant is unimaginable because it is usually the province of lab rats. As a Human Being charged with a soul most should be instinctively if not acutely aware when an uncontrolled egregious assault takes place on either entity, particularly one that relies on submissive fear, ignorance and an abrogation of individual sacred sovereignty, and the right to refuse to be the subject of an “experiment”. For many, that would initially amount to the profound discomfiture of psychological insult followed by the obvious, the torment and pain of very large numbers of actual injury. However, for most it seems that being conned, coerced or compliant is fairly tolerable, provided life chugs along more or less as usual. What’s around the corner is of no interest.
Going along to get along. A pandemic of its own.
For a defined elite, it all seems like an awful lot of excitement and fun, three dimensional chess. For the ‘cancelled’ and ‘censored’ it is as binary as black and white, war and peace. It is not fun. It is deadly serious.
The Intentional Uncertainty Of No Controls
the [Pfizer] control group was intentionally lost under the auspices of “the right thing to do”, so there is no way for the efficacy, effectiveness or safety of the vaccine itself to be measured.
In spite of this the UK Office of National Statistics (Published: 28 June 2021
PHE gateway number: GOV-8775) faithfully generated and spruiked (invalid) modeled, ‘assumed’, ‘estimated’, and ‘simlated’ ‘effectiveness’ … according to plan.
Vaccination rates in the model are based on the actual number of doses administered, and the vaccine is assumed to reduce susceptibility to COVID-19 as well as mortality once infected. Estimates for vaccine efficacy are based on the best available published results (5). To infer the impact of vaccination, the model was fitted to both ONS prevalence and daily COVID-19 mortality data in England, resulting in posterior [retrospective] samples for a range of epidemiological parameters. The posterior samples were then used to simulate the number of infections and deaths that would have occurred without vaccination (Figure 1). Finally, the total impact was calculated by comparing the infection and mortality estimates with vaccination versus the simulated outcomes without vaccination
In short, nonsense in nonsense out.
They knew the “vaccine” injection neither prevented transmission nor infection ~ Texas prison study or the Vietnam hospital study. Others had already clearly demonstrated the illusive utility of the jab, and the possession of a trivial, short lived, variable, unpredictable real world absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 0.46% and the number-needed-to-vaccinate to successfully 'vaccinate' one case (NNV): 217 (Olliaro P, Torreele E, Vaillant, 2021).
Regrettably for the believers of uncertainty, it is said that there are those at the University of Auckland, apparently in the discipline of public “health” who consider an ARR and an ‘odds ratio’ (OR) mentioned in connection with the vaunted Pfizer shot efficacy of relative risk reduction (RRR) of 95% an unmentionable and misplaced faux pas of disinformation.
Others however, clearly disagree:
It is recommended that researchers report both a relative and an absolute measure and present these with appropriate confidence intervals.
And of course as a hapless lab rat you would never have provided consent had you been fully informed, which of course there-was-never-any-intention-to-do and would have been quite impossible to do, which is why it was intentionally not done.
There are degrees of awfulness here, and as the uncertainty accumulates so does the awfulness.
Industrial ‘Lack Of Experience’ Or Intentional?
Thus spaketh the “experts” in March 2020 advising CEPI and its funded safety platform, The Brighton Collaboration, in which the New Zealand Government (along with a number of others including UK, Australia and Canada) just happen to be listed as Investors & Partners, although the New Zealand Ministry of Health categorically denied any connection and intimated no other Ministry had a connection, although it is perfectly clear the New Zealand Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment is fully engaged.
CEPI was founded in Davos by the governments of Norway and India, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome, and the World Economic Forum.
To date, CEPI has secured financial support from Australia, Austria, Belgium, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Canada, Denmark, the European Commission, Ethiopia, Finland, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Panama, Portugal, Philippines, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Singapore, Switzerland, Republic of Korea, United Kingdom, USA, and Wellcome.
CEPI is a BigPharma WEF supranational pretender. NZ GOV actively conceals the nature of its relationship. Conflict of interest anyone?
Anyway, back to, thus spaketh the “experts” in March 2020 advising CEPI and its funded safety platform, The Brighton Collaboration These experts stated:
Of course, disadvantages include the novel nature of both mRNA and DNA vaccines without any licensed vaccine with either technology to date and lack of experience for mass production. Therefore, multiple platforms for SARS-CoV-2 are under development that mitigate against some of the potential disadvantages of nucleic acid vaccines.
A scant 9 months later the UK was with political bravado and media glee, injecting its fear primed populace.
Is All This Uncertainty Raising Your Blood Pressure?
Hyper-uncertainty And Hypertension, Anyone?
Has any clinician noticed in the last little while an escalation in the number of novel hypertensives, and the escalation of prescription of anti-hypertensive medication to hitherto controlled hypertensives who suddenly became uncontrolled?
Not to worry if you didn’t. Professor Fabio Angeli (Professor of Cardiology at Università degli Studi dell'Insubria and colleagues did, back in May 2022, stating,
“In conclusion, abnormal BP is not rare after COVID-19 vaccination, but the basic mechanisms of this phenomenon are still unclear and require further research.”
Silence. Chirping crickets.
Well not quite.
Two significant events have transpired since that got my attention. First, the tragedy of ‘The Silence of the Lambs’.
Second, in the most recent New Zealand Respiratory Research Review (Issue 207) Professor Lutz Beckert encourages readers in his ‘Welcome’ editorial to, “stretch their minds, a brilliant review article on, ‘The Role Of Circular RNAs in Pulmonary Hypertension’.” (Dec 2022)
It is astonishing this has not been called out as disinformation in New Zealand and Prof. Beckert called to explain himself to the NZ Medical Council.
The science and the article is dense and beyond the provenance of this commentary. Nevertheless, the abstract highlights,
“Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are endogenous, covalently circularised, non-protein-coding RNAs generated from back-splicing. Most circRNAs are very stable, highly conserved, and expressed in a tissue-, cell- and developmental stage-specific manner. circRNAs play a significant role in various biological processes, such as regulation of gene expression and protein translation via sponging of microRNAs and binding with RNA-binding proteins.”
“A growing body of evidence suggests that aberrant expression of circRNAs and their targets plays a crucial role in pulmonary vascular remodelling and pulmonary arterial hypertension (group 1) as well as other forms (groups 3 and 4) of pulmonary hypertension (PH).”
Circle back to Professor Fabio Angeli, who might now be the wiser, or perhaps those clinicians more immediately associated with the bizarre tragedy observed across the ditch in Australia when he and his colleagues wrote: “In conclusion, abnormal BP is not rare after COVID-19 vaccination, but the basic mechanisms of this phenomenon are still unclear and require further research.”
A putative basic mechanism is no longer unclear; there is an excellent hypothesis ~ ‘small’ microRNA ~ found in Pfizer shot vials.
What’s In the Damn Vials?
The composition of the Pfizer vials is determined to be wildly uncertain.
They sequenced RNA from a Pfizer vial, and found that none of the strands were conforming to Pfizer’s declared nucleic acid sequence specification. The strand is supposed to be a certain length (~4300 nt). There were 3 possible longer lengths of RNA found in the vial but no complete match. There were many small “broken off” pieces floating around:
This finding was consistent with what the European regulators declared as lack of mRNA integrity/presence of impurities, a very concerning Major Objection that they raised… and then waived the product through without ever resolving it.
Small RNAs are dangerous. They have been described as a potential biological weapon which can induce cancer among other things. Here is an NIH book chapter on biological weapons describing this technical application which is indistinguishable from the current use of these substances in billions of people.
Finally, if this ocean of uncertainty is insufficient for devoted or contractually adherent WEF/ corporate Pfizophiles, it was made abundantly clear relatively early on in July 2021 by Kevin P. Bliden of Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research and Drug Development, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore and his colleagues, that generalised responses to the shots did not occur. The mRNA shots are unpredictable. This fact is invariably and slavishly overlooked, omitted, or erased.
Bliden and colleagues found:
Conclusion: We did observe highly variable immune responses including those with well below averagre anti-RBD (rigid binding domain) IgG levels and avidity. It is therefore important to monitor immune responses at the individulised and personalised level, identify those who are still at risk even after vaccination, and provide meaningful measures to protect them from infections.
Abstract: Immune responses were found to vary greatly among vaccinees. Personalized longitudinal monitoring of antibodies could be necessary to assess the immunity duration of vaccinated individuals.
Unsafe, ineffective, unpredictable.
A lot of ‘UN’ … coincidental that. We should also add UNusable.
Post Script
One might have been coerced with the threat of the loss of employment and income and have submitted to survive. That adds a deeply injured psyche born out of submission to a bully, to the potential for physiological jab injury either immediately or at some indeterminate future date; sudden death anyone? If jab injury was sustained (or if one even knew someone who sustained an injury or suspected a death or the rapid onset of an illness, autoimmune condition or turbo-cancer in association with their jabs) then personal psychological turmoil spirals upwards appallingly.
Moving forward, I wonder whether those coerced would rather prefer not be reminded of their misery, powerlessness and subjugation? Being told that ‘it’s all over’ is sufficient reason and motivation alone to move on and forget the period.
But … there are many for whom that is not possible, as their places of employment continue to insist on compliance with what amounts to truly outrageous corporate mandates. It appears that these virtue signalling corporates, willing stooges for NZ GOV and BigPharma have yet to fully appreciate the magnitude of the liability to which they are exposing themselves.
And when it finally dawns on the populace, as it eventually and surely must, that anywhere between 12 - 20 million people (to date) or more, have lost their lives from jabs right now, as discussed here out of a Lancet article, and explicitly articulated by the Canadian pathologist, Dr Roger Hodkinson, it will be transfixing to watch a host of unintended consequences unfold as though we were sitting in The Restaurant At The End Of The Universe.
I call bs. How about they encourage citizens to stay healthy with plenty of vitamin and antioxident rich food, exercise and fresh air? Damn, fresh air/water is full of chems now.
Those who want certainty are the ones that are the most out of control themselves personally - so they only want someone else to certainly tell them what to do - no matter the uncertain consquences. It's like a warm blanket full of rat poison that gives them security. Great insights here, and love the meme! Do you know who drew it?