Now Finally, A Dawning Perception Of Threat?
Awakening to the evil of the greatest social experiment in human history
Some weekend insightful commentary that emerged from substack that offers more than a killer slice of nanobot cake … more people awakening to the unconscious perception of threat? One lives in fervent hope. This article is suitable for weekend reading, ie. it make take a little longer; a reward lies at the end.
To open then, just keep to the forefront of your mind the nauseating gaslighting and propaganda furnished by UNEP/UNFCCC/WHO/WEF from Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the UN WHO, who recently stated:
I believe the global commitment to sustainable development [socialism sliding into technocratic feudalism, controlled and regulated by social credit scores, compulsory shots and CBDC]– enshrined in the Sustainable Development Goals [the unending 2030 lock down]– offers a unique opportunity [further “pandemics” and orchestrated assaults by needled barrel] to address the social, economic and political determinants of health [“over” population] and improve the health and well being of people everywhere [social credit score, CDBC reward/coercion, complete subservient compliance]. Achieving this vision will require a strong, effective WHO [tyrannical administration by an unelected, unelectable cabal of Malthusian billionaire technocrats and their corporate and bureaucratic spawn] that is able to meet emerging challenges and achieve the health objectives of the Sustainable Development Goals. We need a WHO – fit for the 21st century – that belongs to all, equally. [All national governments will bow down to the fatal DIE ideology]
Tedros continues here and specifically states,
The High-Level Meeting on UHC at the UN General Assembly in 2019 was a historic commitment by world leaders to realise the vision of health for all.
Little did we know then that COVID-19 was just around the corner.
“How little did we know…?”
Well not really…
The SPARS modeled pandemic scenario of 2017
The following narrative comprises a futuristic scenario that illustrates communication dilemmas concerning medical countermeasures (MCMs) that could plausibly emerge in the not-so-distant future
The time frame for the scenario (the years 2025-2028) was selected first, and then major socioeconomic, demographic, technological, and environmental trends likely to have emerged by that period were identified.
One CDC scientist recalled reading a recent ProMed dispatch describing the emergence of a novel coronavirus in Southeast Asia, and ran a pan-coronavirus RT-PCR test. A week later, the CDC team confirmed that the three patients were, in fact, infected with a novel coronavirus, which was dubbed the St. Paul Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SPARS-CoV, or SPARS), after the city where the first cluster of cases had been identified.
The Spars Pandemic 2025 - 2028 Schoch-Spana M, Brunson EK, Shearer MP, Ravi S, Sell TK, Chandler H, Gronvall GK. The SPARS Pandemic, 2025-2028: A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security; October 2017.
Event 201 ~ 2019
Event 201 took place in NYC on 18 October 2019. Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
Geneva, Switzerland, 15 October 2019 – The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation will host Event 201: a high-level simulation exercise for pandemic preparedness and response, in New York, USA, on Friday 18 October, 08.45 - 12.30 EDT.
The exercise will bring together business, government, security and public health leaders to address a hypothetical global pandemic scenario. It will also feature a live virtual experience from 08.50 – 12.30 EDT to engage stakeholders worldwide and members of the public in a meaningful conversation of difficult high-level policy choices that could arise in the midst of a severe pandemic.
The vested interest seen in the line-up of participants appears stunning. Take for example, Jane Halton, Board member, ANZ Bank; Former Secretary of Finance and Former Secretary of Health, Australia, the (undisclosed) Chair of the Board of the Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) founded by the BMGF in 2016/2017, Chris Elias, President, Global Development division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Avril Haines, Former Deputy Director, Central Intelligence Agency; Former Deputy National Security Advisor
Event 201 was also sponsored by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, with cosponsors of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), and the World Economic Forum (WEF). Participants included such prominent UN agencies as the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Bank, the IMF, UNICEF, the UN political body itself – and many more.
Covid-19 was a well-orchestrated epidemic, first declared by WHO, a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, or PHEIC (30 January 2020) and a pandemic on 11 March 2020. Once declared a pandemic, no matter whether justified or not – the world, or those who think they call the shots on Mother Earth, had green light to lock down and destroy the world – socially, economically and morally.
The Psy-Ops Preparation
An extraordinary example of detailed, statistically well powered, population wide Psy-Ops studies were conducted in July and September 2020 from Yale University (see below; funding is undisclosed), which involved nearly 10,000 participants.
Persuasive messaging to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake intentions
E.K. James, S.E. Bokemper, A.S. Gerber et al. Vaccine 39 (2021) 7158–7165
Yale Institute for Global Health, Yale School of Medicine, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale Center for the Study of American Politics, Yale Department of Political Science, Yale School of Public Health, Yale School of Nursing.
The studies were conducted in July 2020 (experiment 1) and September 2020 (experiment 2).
Experiment 1: 4,361 participants completed the survey and in Experiment 2: 5,014 participants were recruited by the vendor YouGov/Polimetrix, with a sampling procedure designed to match a number of Census demographics.
This study tests different messages about vaccinating against COVID-19 once the vaccine becomes available. Participants are randomized to 1 of 12 arms, with one control arm and one baseline arm. We will compare the reported willingness to get a COVID-19 vaccine at 3 and 6 months of it becoming available between the 10 intervention arms to the 2 control arms ~ The first experiment in this study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov and can be found under the ID number NCT04460703.
The experiments presented here are not without limitations. First, we measured intentions to vaccinate at a time when a vaccine was not currently available and the effectiveness and side effects of potential vaccines were not known. (!) This also meant that we could not observe actual vaccination behavior, which is ultimately the outcome of interest. (!)
Widespread vaccination remains the best option for controlling the spread of COVID-19 and ending the pandemic. [No evidence for this whatsoever]
Emphasizing that vaccination is a prosocial action increases uptake, and increases people’s willingness to pressure others, both by direct persuasion and negative judgment of non-vaccinators. The latter social pressure effects may be enhanced by highlighting how embarrassing it would be to infect someone else after failing to vaccinate.
The ‘Not Bravery’ and ‘Trust in Science’ messages had substantial effects regarding outcomes but do not appear to be as effective as the ‘Community Interest’ messages in promoting own vaccination behavior. ‘Community Interest’, ‘Community Interest + Embarrassment’, and the ‘Not Bravery’ messages produced substantively meaningful increases for all outcomes measures relative to controls.
Our findings are consistent with the idea that vaccination is often treated as a social contract in which people are expected to vaccinate and those who do not are sanctioned emphasizing the prosocial element of vaccination and the reputational concerns that emerged in those who would free ride on the contributions of others.
The way they get policymakers and the military onboard is by insisting that the adoption of these technologies is a national security issue; that nations that don’t adopt human augmentation technology will be left behind and dominated politically, economically, socially, and militarily by those that do.
Human augmentation is not a one-and-done thing. It is an ongoing process. The augmented humans of 2040 would seem laughably primitive next to the augmented humans of 2100, who will, in turn, seem like troglodytes to the augmented humans of 2500, if they could even be called human anymore, at that point. Where does it end? What is the final outcome?
This is not a conspiracy theory. The term conspiracy theory implies that there is a hypothetical conspiracy. This is not hypothetical. We are beyond the point where it could be called a hypothesis. This is what the conspirators and the people analyzing and/or contributing to their activities sound like, in their own words. If dozens of people in lofty positions of power and authority are all saying the same exact things about algorithmic governance, mind control, and using bionanotechnology to split humans into distinct biological castes, that’s not a conspiracy theory. That’s a conspiracy fact. The only reason why anyone would label any of this a conspiracy theory is if they dream of implementing all of these things without a concerted public backlash, and they would rather that people remain docile and unaware as their fundamental rights—even their own bodily autonomy—are slowly stripped away from them, and they have resorted to gaslighting people to make that totalitarian dream a reality.
Klaus Schwab’s COVID-19: The Great Reset is chock-full of predictions that didn’t come true, written by the world’s foremost coattail-hanger. For example:
Klaus stated that the response to the pandemic would bring about more welfare for the poor. Instead, it transferred trillions of dollars from the poor to the rich and led to the theft of hundreds of billions of dollars in aid money.
Klaus stated that so-called “fragile” countries, such as African nations with systemic poverty, would suffer the effects of the pandemic the worst. On the contrary, COVID-19 didn’t affect poor African nations nearly as much as it affected affluent ones with lots of older people in failing health.
Klaus predicted that Weimar-style hyperinflation of the US Dollar could be avoided. Instead, we are seeing signs of Weimar-style hyperinflation, as the purchasing power of the dollar shrinks, and the prices of basic staple goods begin to skyrocket.
Klaus predicted that the USD would retain its currency hegemony. Instead, many nations are seriously considering dedollarization.
Klaus predicted that the shocks from the pandemic would lead to a resurgence in global governance and a consolidation of power by supranationals. Instead, there is a massive populist backlash directed at him in particular.
The fact that this bloviating hack spewing page after page of wishful thinking and dreaming up totalitarian uses for mad science he barely understands was able to tug the ears of so many politicians the world over is a sad indictment of the utterly dysfunctional system in which we live.
In his writings, Klaus Schwab believes that he makes a case for more globalism, more internationalism, and more top-down management of society by supranational interests. Instead, he makes a perfect case for localism and returning the power of self-determination to the people where it belongs.
And finally, this wonderful piece of inspirational prose that could be an anthem.