This turned out far longer than I initially conceived. Your patient indulgence please.
Diagrams below on how to do this, though technically, the loins reside in the back either side of the spine, spanning a reach from the lower rib to the hips, typically overlying the kidneys.
‘Language’ as expressed by the written word has always irked and fascinated me, be it the crafted words of Thomas Hardy or James Salter, or the mind numbing, dumbed-up bureaucratic language in common use today, designed to mislead, to promote agendas, to conceal truth, to misdirect, to leverage power. On a bad day, it becomes the province of the fastidious and sometime pedant; but as is oft written, the devil lies in the detail ~ proverb: Plans, actions, or situations that seem sound must be carefully examined, because minor details can end up causing major, unforeseen problems.
We can omit ‘unforeseen’ from the above definition given our current context.
The written language has its own cadence and rhythm, its own balance of unique shading and colour. It may depict precision through these or it may sketch with vagueness. It may trace truth and fact or it may paint something else altogether, something counterfactual, standing against the meme or narrative of the moment. It is in its way musical notes on a score, though the latter arguably allows, indeed encourages, greater latitude born of the freedom of personal interpretation and expression. Words on the other hand are the meandering stuff of power and control, of distraction and allusion, of truth and lies, of prayer and the plea for redemption, and so much more in the vast repository that is written communication.
BUT…
…The act of deliberately perverting words and language is diabolical and infernal.
Its brittle exponents betray themselves as they strive to maliciously carve out and advance their bullying agendas. Controlling language, framing narratives, nudging, and erasing dissent by redefining it as ‘disinformation’ or ‘hate’, or even ‘disease’, they overpopulate the spineless edifices of State, New Zealand former Prime Minister Ardern’s pet obsession, the Disinformation Project being a living exemplar. They have no choice but to tenaciously promote the lie that they are the apical representatives of society. Their neopronoun is ‘civil society’. What they actually imply is that they are a tribally bound ‘polite society’ a self-defining entity with a particular code of politesse where, ils s’échangent des politesses mais en réalité, ils se détestent.
New Zealand ‘society’ exemplifies this cultivated derangement.
British gender activist Posie Parker has left New Zealand, calling it "the worst place for women" she has ever visited.
Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling took to Twitter this morning to brand the protest scenes in Auckland yesterday "repellent".
During a series of Tweets, she said a mob "had assaulted women standing up for their rights".
Parker posted to Twitter and said she was leaving the worst place for women she had ever visited.
The activist also claimed she was a victim of a campaign to assassinate her character, boosted by a "corrupt media populated by vile dishonest cult members".
Nothing Civilised about ‘Civil’
Civil is lazily and unconsciously translated in ignorance bereft of discernment, it is considered synonymous, even laced with a comforting soupçon of subliminal reassurance, all by design. It is reassuringly thought of as civilised (though that is never spoken)society, indeed this is a groomed implication.
It is nothing more than a sleight of linguistic contraction, a convenient malapropism. It commands rigid ‘politeness’ (conforming and compliant) and it is reflective of tyranny. Its ordered pretense of societal trust and cohesion is an illusion. It is merely adherence. The harsh reality we recently witnessed in New Zealand ~ Posie Parker (Mrs Keen-Minshull) ~ (and apparently tolerate) is the brittle fragility of incoherent self-loathing, a desperate need to drag everyone into the same ideologically imbued quagmire, a Nietzschian monster en route to the beckoning abyss so ably described here:
Almost no one refers to civilised society any longer. Hardly surprising when one thinks about it, but also, to do so would be to trigger the auto-enragement function of the self-appointed offendodrons of rainbow DIE ideology, as we have just seen. It is nevertheless self-evident that ruthless uncivilised behaviour permeates civil society. Oh the irony.
The Direct Attack
I argue that the deliberate politicization and Orwellian misuse of language is a vicious, determined and premeditated assault on civilisation. ‘Anti-vaxx’, ‘Pandemic’, ‘Vaccination’, ‘Protection’, ‘Lock down’, ‘Face Covering’ ‘Mandate’ are words that became the indisputable nomenclature of tyranny, accompanied by the truly dystopian and inhuman manifestation of absolute political certitude, test-lite, consent-lite, needled barrels of unsafe, ineffective, negative benefit, unpredictably acting, synthetic poison, followed by an glaring and historical temporal association with the dramatic escalation in excess death and sickness above the mean. Political certitude is an oxymoron. No politician allows themselves zero wriggle room. Caveats and exeats invariably abound.
They are all quite literally at it all the time. It speaks to the negative buoyancy of their self-perceived worth, ideology and relevance, delusions that require perpetual massage and an infinite source of compressed air.
A '''pandemic''', or '''global Epidemic,''' is an outbreak of an Infectious_disease that affects people over an extensive geographical area (from Greek ''pan'' all + ''demos'' people). == Common killers and pandemics == According to the World Health Organization, a pandemic can start when three conditions have been met: * the emergence of a disease new to the population * the agent infects humans, causing serious illness * the agent spreads easily and sustainably among humans. A disease or condition is not a pandemic specifically because it kills a large number of people.
New Zealand’s own media beatified and State knighted medical leader of ethics and public health was shoulder tapped. He must be good, very good.
Ashley Bloomfield, former Director-General of Health of New Zealand, who co-chairs the WHO working group (Int. Health Rules Review Committtee) on updating the 2005 WHO International Health Regulations, which concluded its latest round of discussions on Friday. He was reported to say:
“The efforts to update the International Health Regulations and draft apandemic accord share a number of common themes, including the importance of equity in access to health, collaboration and capacity building,” he said. “It is important that there is consistency and alignment across the two processes.”
In effect he said nothing here. Meaningless, vacant gesticulating verbiage. It is what he didn’t say that was crucial.
At the UN General Assembly’s first-of-its-kind science session, held in early February, epidemiologists and researchers had called for a global pandemic warning system. Suggestions included forging a new global digital collaboration comprising a network of researchers connected through an open-source data science platform capable of quantifying, modeling, and ultimately solving any climate and health problem at any scale.
Climatism now segues into public health, undoubtedly and eventually the ideological undoing of both. Falsifiable ‘global warming’ was rapidly supplanted by unfalsifiable ‘climate change’. These days it doesn’t take too much to falsify the notion of a pandemic, and show the possibility (or probability) it bore close resemblance to an orchestrated and tightly planned scamdemic.
UK’s euphemistically-named Health Security Agency failed to provide/cite any record at HSA or Public Health England describing purification of the imaginary "SARS-COV-2" from a clinical sample, since no such record exists anywhere on Earth, because virology is pseudoscience.
Dr Jonathan Couey PhD (University of Pittsburgh | Pitt · Department of Neurobiology) is a biologist and virologist who has been reporting on Covid-19 since the beginning, accepting some of the official narrative but certain the virus was engineered. It has only been the last year when it has dawned on him, most of the basis for the narrative is biologically false.
I’VE GROWN INCREASINGLY FRUSTRATED about the way debate is controlled around the topic of origins of the alleged novel virus, SARS-CoV-2, and I have come to disbelieve it’s ever been in circulation, causing massive scale illness and death. Concerningly, almost no one will entertain this possibility, despite the fact that molecular biology is the easiest discipline in which to cheat.
That’s because you really cannot do it without computers, and sequencing requires complex algorithms and, importantly, assumptions. Tweaking algorithms and assumptions, you can hugely alter the conclusions.
The authors also estimate a global total of approximately 13 million deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines.
Back To The Great Alignment of Purpose, c.2015
Rainbow pretender Bergoglio opened the 70th UN General Assembly in September 2015, conferring his tacit imprimatur and ideological alignment upon a UN General Assembly that launched the euphemistically named, 2030 ‘Transformational’ agenda, a document that conveyed an altogether different and menacing socialist interpretation of ‘transformation’ and its UNsustainable “development” goals. The alignment of State and Church was once unmistakable but appears to have crept again, largely under a guise of environmentalism. It raises a rhetorical question, it surely appears time for another Reformation, one that again enforces a separation of Church and politics? It also defines a new separation required of politics from science (technocracy)?
The re-badged and uninvited ‘transformational agenda’ is embodied in the focused mobilisation of cohorts of activist foot soldiers, a legion of UN accredited NGOs masquerading under the term, ‘Civil Society’ poised and willing to follow direction from their unelected (and unelectable) UN technocratic and bureaucratic bosses to take down civilisation and the body politic as we know it, replacing it instead with an unelected ‘administrative’ technocratic / bureaucratic elite.
Only, this time the erstwhile ‘transformation’ goes boldly far further, by emplacing a ‘do by’ date, 2030. And just like the injections, the over emboldened hubris riddled political class bizarrely left themselves no wriggle room. Consequently, today we see the routine use of ‘stone-walling’ as a de rigueur tactic of de-legitimisation. It countenances no concession and it will not stop unless it is stopped or physically arrested and removed. And so it is with 2030 and the “Agenda.” One senses ‘they’ will enforce this ‘do-by year’ at the end of a barrel of one sort or another (rifle or needle), IF WE PERMIT IT.
The clever malapropism of Civil Society has become lingua franca, almost as ubiquitous as the unfailingly misused, carefully manufactured and manipulative term, climate change™.
People including a majority of the State funded or bribed parrot propaganda media think they know what these words actually mean, referring to the Concise Oxford Dictionary or Merriam-Webster. This kollectiv are frequently too lazy to look beyond an assumed and vague generalisation. They become by default a fulfillment of the idea of useful idiots. They do not appear to realise (or perhaps on an outside chance they do and they remain silent?) that the words and phrases have been defined very intently elsewhere, that they have been turned into subversive indoctrinating tools undermining and perverting common language usage and meaning and at the same time using common language and cultivated misperception as a means for meme propagation.
Hardly anyone refers to civilised society any longer. The malapropism in use is ‘civil society’.
‘Civil’ is repressively ‘polite’.
But ‘polite’ it most certainly is not, nor was it ever. It is a superficial label for a series of sterilised and controlled monologues that reflect internal agreement and adhesion among its participants. There can never be ‘dialogue’ in the true sense of the meaning ~ ‘dia’ ‘logos’ is explicitly forbidden.
‘Polite’ society embraces moral relativism. The scintillating cognitive dissonance on display is legendary. Zyklon B is intolerable while stonewalling the global excess deaths above the mean (est. 13 million or more), possessing unequivocal and strong temporal associated with synthetic polynucleotide/lipid nanoparticled shots is good to go. ‘Polite society’ is mute in its Party political manifesto, and once in government dissociates from its constituency and embarks upon an intentional dissection. It divides a country along every conceivable axis, rendering the very notions of country, identity, cohesion and social trust contestable and redundant.
What is the UN foot soldiers construct, ‘Civil Society’?
Since the adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in 2015, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) play an even more important role as partners to the United Nations on the ground. They support the Organization in advancing its mission and objectives and help the international community deliver this roadmap.
[civil society organization (CSO) or non-governmental organization (NGO)] CSOs provide analysis and expertise, serve as early warning mechanisms and help monitor and implement international agreements, including Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals.
Over 1,500 CSOs with strong information programmes on issues of concern to the United Nations are currently in formal association with the Department of Global Communications, giving the United Nations valuable links to people and communities around the world. United Nations Department of Global Communications (DGC) helps CSOs gain access to and disseminate information about the range of issues in which the United Nations is involved, to enable them to more effectively carry out their activities in support of the UN Charter and to raise awareness among public audiences about the work of the Organization.
“When mobilized, civil society - sometimes called the “third sector” (after government and commerce) - has the power to influence the actions of elected policy-makers and businesses.”
“It is hard to quantify just how big the sector is globally. However, one study says that NGOs across 40 countries represent $2.2 trillion in operating expenditures.” [there are between 2000 - 3000 UN ‘accredited’ NGOs]
“Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, wrote in the preface to a 2013 report, The Future Role of Civil Society: “NGOs, labour leaders, faith-based organizations, religious leaders and other civil society representatives play a critical and diverse set of roles in societal development.”
“The definitions are changing as civil society is recognized as encompassing far more than a mere ‘sector’ dominated by the NGO community: civil society today includes an ever wider and more vibrant range of organized and unorganized groups, as new civil-society actors blur the boundaries between sectors and experiment with new organizational forms, both online and off.”
“Examples of well-known civil society organizations include Amnesty International, the International Trade Union Confederation, the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Greenpeace and the Danish Refugee Council (DRC).”
Weaponisation against dissenting liberty?
Human rights group Amnesty International, for example, is experimenting with a form of artificial intelligence known as machine learning to see what influence it could have in areas such as policing, criminal justice, the development of autonomous weapons and its possible impacts on our rights to work and earn a living.
The WWF, on the other hand, is harnessing aerial drone technology, animal tracking devices and infrared cameras in its battle against the illegal poaching of endangered species.
Or the simple and sinister, social nudging tools:
Others have developed new partnerships, for example with UNICEF (United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund in full, now officially United Nations Children's Fund), to create bot software to engage with young people on social media platforms. UNICEF’s U-Report bot is a free SMS social monitoring tool. It assesses how young people feel about important issues based on responses to SMS polls and alerts.
Extended Post Script
Names that keep popping up with relentlessness repetition, eponymous warnings from the graves of George Orwell, Saul Alinsky, and Richard Cloward. Cloward’s wife, Frances Fox Piven is still with us. There is no recantation. The links below offer a route to further explanation and clarification.
Implement Socialism and Communism through Government Force
The main reason I bring this up is because we bear witness today to perhaps the greatest revolutionary and malicious re-write (colloquially referred to as an update) of the English language AND (Cloward-Piven) the greatest multipronged assault on the structures of civilisation by ‘civil society’.
…there are rules for radicals who want to change their world; there are certain central concepts of action in human politics that operate regardless of the scene or the time. To know these is basic to a pragmatic attack on the system.
Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution.
That being said, aside from attempts to expand the control of language, words and ultimately thought, it is also clear that stone walling silence has become another effective tool used by current governments, bureaucratic authorities and supranational entities as the means of controlling and dismissing a counter narrative and thereby, the means of rejecting the imposed ideological fuelled trajectory of technocentric inhuman trans-humanism.
Delegitimisation
The ploy of stone-walling is particularly and deeply frustrating. It denies fundamental human recognition, it literally delegitimizes the counter narrative by denying its existence. It has been a key tactic employed to date. The next step ~ demonisation ~ is an obvious one.
People, experts, the data, the research, Uncle Tom Cobbly ‘n all, pleading to be heard, demanding that the evidence of death and harm, of ineffectiveness, of unpredictability and the accompanying desertion of all that was established as ethical and sacred, these are all things that must be addressed, that should be acknowledged. They remain tacitly and explicitly ignored.
It was obvious from the start.
The complete absence of political wriggle room in execution, instigation and expedition of mass, novel synthetic polynucleotide injection denoted total adherence to a defined objective. There was no room for reversal. Any emergent post hoc acknowledgement would be a categorical statement of the admission of wrong doing. That will not happen. Not in a milllion years. Instead, it will need to be wrested out of a metaphorical dumb mute with lockjaw. Political suicide is not a voluntary activity.
The silent, bought and tangibly scared, gutless media treacherously and intentionally stifle information, insight, debate and dissent. They strut across the soul of the populace in highly polished jack boots to the jingling coinage of 30 pieces of silver dancing in their dank pockets. Their betrayal is as unforgettable as it is unforgivable.
And what use then freedom of speech, if dissent becomes dismissed disinformation and institutional deafness prevails by intent while media is complicit and silent? In the interim, social media becomes a safety valve, a pressure relieving mechanism, a means by which people feel empowered, free to express concerns, engaging with like-minded community, but through which relatively little action actually takes place. I have referred to this as circling the drain. Doubtless, many others have too. There really isn’t too much new under the sun.
The incredibly rare oozlum bird also epitomizes this phenomena.
The Physics of the Oozlum Bird is intriguing because it has the ability to fly around in ever-decreasing circles until it disappears [with an almighty big bang] into a black hole.
The oozlum bird, also spelled ouzelum, is a legendary creature found in Australian and British folk tales and legends.
Some versions have it that, when startled, the bird will take off and fly around in ever-decreasing circles until it manages to fly up itself, disappearing completely, which adds to its rarity.
So, between a media that is silent, the official stonewalling and the widespread mnaipulation of language and the various attempts at thought control, the noose is feeling quite tight and there seems a growing sense that the precarious, teetering perch, the wobbling stool is about to be kicked out from underneath us all.
The Manipulation of Language Is An Intentional Obfuscation
Having dealt with ‘civil society’ we cannot exit this subject without quick reference to another irksome bête noire of prose, the ridiculous term, climate change™.
It is helpful to ask those spruiking the propaganda talking points to outline their definition of climate change™. After all, it is useful to bring it into the open, to explicitly table the idea that it is unfalsifiable without one key action, the obliteration of all of humanity, every single person.
Understand that various definitions have been used to described this allegedly representative 30 year period. These definitions (IPCC, UNFCCC, et al) are essentially predicated on the consequences of indirect and direct anthropogenic (human) influences on land usage and atmospheric composition. Consequently then, climate change™ can never be falsified so long as there is a single human crawling across the face of Gaia. The move to reduce the purported direct and indirect anthropogenic influences resulting in climate change™ appears well underway on a number of potential population reducing fronts. It is now within the purview of “public health.”
At the UN General Assembly’s first-of-its-kind science session, held in early February, epidemiologists and researchers had called for a global pandemic warning system. Suggestions included forging a new global digital collaboration comprising a network of researchers connected through an open-source data science platform capable of quantifying, modeling, and ultimately solving any climate and health problem at any scale.
All this is presided over by that willing and devoted legion euphemistically and bizarrely referred to as ‘Civil Society’, which includes much of the national body politic.
And it begs the divisive, excluding question, what is someone who is not a member of this select, accredited, approved UN group of activists?
Uncivil? UNcivil
And their pending destiny?
An end to circling the drain draws closer by the day.
Beacons of Light And Beacons of Civilisation
Let us each become beacons of light serving each other in this Dark Age.
Let us hold and sow the seeds of a brilliant future in The Light, free from fear.
Laus Deo Semper.
ps. If you got this far, my profound thanks for your forbearance. Forgiveness is asked for the numerous typos, and failings of syntax and grammar.
Thank you, that was very compelling, customarily language rich and enticing to the end. I fully agree with you that we are in an awful quandary of quantum proportions with many machiavellian players. Regarding stonewalling from media I’m placing blame here on editors and in the case of Western Australia’s market share leading paper (The West Australian newspaper) Seven West Media owned by Kerry Stokes has had inordinate influence on the narrative we’ve been spoon fed, especially the past 3 years. I’m not aware of any journalists that have departed the organisation in order to write the truth and follow facts but indeed he who owns the news owns the people. That graphic floating around detailing the big 3 or so organisations that own all else is a devilish picture of greed, thirst for power and evil enterprise which they’ve been manoeuvring to create for many years while most of us have been asleep at the wheel. Who knew our existence was false pretence.
Thank you, that was very compelling, customarily language rich and enticing to the end. I fully agree with you that we are in an awful quandary of quantum proportions with many machiavellian players. Regarding stonewalling from media I’m placing blame here on editors and in the case of Western Australia’s market share leading paper (The West Australian newspaper) Seven West Media owned by Kerry Stokes has had inordinate influence on the narrative we’ve been spoon fed, especially the past 3 years. I’m not aware of any journalists that have departed the organisation in order to write the truth and follow facts but indeed he who owns the news owns the people. That graphic floating around detailing the big 3 or so organisations that own all else is a devilish picture of greed, thirst for power and evil enterprise which they’ve been manoeuvring to create for many years while most of us have been asleep at the wheel. Who knew our existence was false pretence.