Social Narcosis And Self-Censorship?
Time To Resist The Conditioning. Time To Stop Fearing Shadows.
I am reminded of John Cleese and a fixed part of the humour of the series Fawlty Towers, the classic comedy moment where Basil waits on German guests. An extended clip from series 1, 'The Germans.'
“Don’t mention the war.”
Today the ubiquitous self-censoring corollary, “Don’t mention the jabs.”
But there is no comedy here or now, merely a pernicious imbroglio of farce, satire and pantomime, a pink globalist blancmange tainted by ideology and the clotted blood of its victims, and utterly dependent upon relentless conditioning.
One could also include ‘evil’ in the description of this globalist imbroglio. It seems an appropriate and fitting word.
Any doubts?
Just read a latest offering from the New Zealand Hatchard team entitled, The Web of Government-Backed Confusion. This is required reading for anyone who doubts the blatantly nefarious State sabotage being routinely inflicted on New Zealand society by its deeply flawed government and its genuflecting acolyte, the bribed Fourth Estate become twisted Fifth Column. For any Davos cult believer who has yet to experience a glimpse of joy in the redemption of doubt, Hatchard may just help twitch the scales of conditioning from unquestioning eyes. If he does not, then ponder awhile the Davos fixation on a re-run of the control and economics of the 19th Century company store with a dose of GO/rGO thrown in for good measure.
Recognise The Conspiracy
Power drunk politicians with their ideological driven regressive polices aimed at the crystrallisation of a dystopian version of the 19th Century company store coupled to round the clock surveillance have ruined and jeopardized our lives, shattered our economies, and intentionally deprived us of reliable and plentiful energy about which a sophisticated 21st Century life is impossible, let alone any ability to keep warm in winter or recharge a ‘trick vehicle.
In any event, in the near future almost no one will own one of those adverts for child-slave labour because personal freedoms, which include the freedom of movement, are being stripped away very rapidly, while the energy to power them is prohibitively expensive, and UN Urban Agenda Habitat III (currently being implemented surreptitiously by your municipal Council) stipulates categorically that you will walk, take public transport or pedal a bicycle. That was the plan from the outset. No private cars.
These assaults will surely continue while we allow them. Death comes slowly by a thousand cuts and an endless cluster of jabs.
New Zealand State funded actress Kate Hannah of the euphemistically termed ‘disinfoproject’ unwittingly exposes the extent of the Government conspiracy against its own populous. She not only reveals the brittle fragility and rank paranoia exhibited by the State but the enormous lengths to which it will go in order to propagandize, promote and indoctrinate regressive and absolute State control. The moment to moment tactic and the over-arching strategy is the delegitimisation of all opposition and dissent. It is a hackneyed, clichéd play-book that incipient totalitarian regimes and their useful idiots reliably use, and it presents a devastating cliché in NZzzz.
The State narrative is wrapped in the carapace of a ludicrously dehumanising and rigid vernacular. This is the lingua franca of all its attendant bureaucracies and media. It has become all but incomprehensible in thought, word and action to the majority of people. The keratinised ideological silo contains the gelatinous constructs of neo-Marxist verbiage, simplistically summed up in short hand by the term, ‘pregnant people’.
The New Zealand government is currently tightly entrenched in a publicly announced crusade, nay, ‘war’ in PM Ardern-UN-speak. The war to which she refers is in her head. It is one she wages that dismisses debate, disagreement and dissent as ‘disinformation’, ‘misinformation’ or ‘malinformation’, aka “MDM.”
By the by, none of this and much else was made explicit in the Labour party manifesto at the last election. At least one unintended emergent political consequence is the growing consensus of agreement that politicians and their nodding bureaucrats are a toxic and increasingly useless if not perniciously evil, societal encumbrance promoting and enacting policies no one was advised let alone debated or voted upon. These administrative elite daily betray themselves as a tyranny, a bane upon an ethical, civilised, functional, and once relatively prosperous society.
‘Disinformation’, ‘Misinformation’ or ‘Malinformation’
The MDM acronym emerges from an academic endeavour in 2017 to dodge and redefine the insult du jour, ‘fake news’.
A white paper published by the Council of Europe, researchers Claire Wardle, PhD and Hossein Derakshan presented a framework for understanding and analyzing the challenges related to information disorder. The Wardle-Derakshan Framework also mentioned the three categories of information disorder: misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation ~ link here.
This was an adroit move to undermine and invert an explicit commonly used pejorative that defined the MSM who were in the death throes of incompetently revealing themselves as low wattage, amateur news manufacturers. Alinsky’s exhortation, ‘control the language and you control the people’ has since been embraced enthusiastically by governments and media, addicted to the intoxication of their own hubris. The inversion of the insult is complete and its focus rests now on dissent. The ‘fake-news’ of course continues.
Deep Conditioning
A very obvious taboo exists in polite company regarding any reference to jabs, jabbing, the persecution of jabbees, dead jabbees, sickened jabbees, government policies around jabbing, ‘a plandemic of the unjabbed’, jab/job mandates, the unquestionable and irrefutable absence of safe and effective, the presence of negative risk benefit, of trivial, very short lived and unpredictable effectiveness, all with the overlay of an obvious societal con, laced by institutionalised coercion and division.
Self-censorship is alive and well.
The recently instilled taboo seems at first glance quite difficult to fathom. For it is an artful and effective coup d’état on sanity and the product of relentless conditioning. It successfully shifted the weight and balance of ethics away from individual sovereignty toward a dystopian collectivism. It is part of a wider orchestrated move, namely the imposition of an ideology engineering the same societal shift in all mores.
Even more recently and quite sinister in its duplicitous and vacant expression, is the accompanying development of a caterwauling of faux apology that together with the taboo attempts to cultivate a, ‘do not mention’ conditioning, comedically depicted by Basil in, ‘The Germans’.
It is menacingly described by Orwell as a ‘memory-hole’.
Orwellian memory-holes are psy-op manufactured constructs whereby official information that once buoyed up and spurred the narrative is no longer required, or is no longer relevant or is now frankly wrong. At best, such information is no longer helpful to the cause or at worst, hugely inconvenient. Thus, it is pretended that it never existed in the first place. Jabs preventing transmission furnishes a perfect example. ‘Safe and Effective’, another, masking and lock-downs yet others.
We are seeing the construction of the largest memory hole in history. And it needs to be, for it has to conceal the largest and ongoing multi-pronged assault ever perpetrated on wider humanity.
Do Not Forget
So let’s turn to Neil Oliver for a moment. He implores us, begs us, not to forget. After all, the subtext to not mentioning something is to forget it, to memory hole it.
Neil Oliver: We are expected to forget those promising to fix the disaster caused it
Maintaining a constant state of disaster to facilitate control of populations. Lies to cover lies. Neil Oliver warns, you’re expected to forget you were lied to. Neil concludes his monologue by stating that he will never forget.
And neither will we.
We will never forget even as the narcissistic faux-apologies are published in well known paid for play media outlets, and the memory holing of the COVID plandemic take down is wound-up to full noise. We will remember the many main players, the politicians, the police, the professionals who remain invested in the commission of the WEF playbook (and if they claim they were not aware, as most doubtlessly will, their culpability remains as a crime of omission).
The sheer amount of published articles, the literature highlighting the awful deleterious social, medical, physiological and long term predicted consequences of receiving synthetic mRNA / lipid nanoparticle jabs is now present in elephantine proportion, obvious, implying that it must be increasingly difficult not to acknowledge the substantive data-driven counterpoint to the increasingly ridiculous psy-ops conditioning of 'safe and effective’.
Presently, any number of over-paid in-actions ensure that a disintegrating teetering narrative remains erect. Well paid silence, looking away, overt pretense, censorship, and ceaseless propaganda, these are a few of the blunt tools of that trade. The relentless psy-ops has been very well thought through, indeed formally tested before the jabs even became available. It was initially effective but its durability is poor with respect to recurrent jab take-up.
While it orchestrated 80% compliance in New Zealand (Pfizer jab 1 & 2), this diminished rapidly. However, the compliance appears to have become internalised to the degree that it has achieved the removal of a ‘risky’ subject from polite conversation in self-censorship. I find this latter point particularly difficult to stomach. As one measure then to inhibit memory-holing, we need to continue to speak loudly and repetitively of the sordid and unprecedented State assault by barreled needle.
Post Script
Day after day, a multitude of incisive commentary is available that picks apart and exposes the many threads of the societal noose. The secret efforts of the WHO, that un-elected and un-electable body of meddlesome bureaucrats peddled by ideologues and greed at the WEF, BMGF, and BigPharma, the long list of investing and funding globalist aligned countries of the West all literally plotting to betray their people by surrendering their medical and ethical sovereignty to supra-national entities; all these threads woven in the background are being picked at rather effectively.
And seeping into wider consciousness is the growing awareness. For example, the deliberate mis-characterisation of tragic infant deaths, from neonatal death to still born, the former attracting the obliged attention of the coroner, while the latter receives no attention. This topical issue is currently with the Scottish authorities who concede a doubling of the still birth rate but deny any likelihood of a causal association with jabs in pregnancy. It will be no different elsewhere including New Zealand, whose authorities are busily trying to amend the Coroners Act with quite feasibly, the same unspoken goals in mind.
It strikes me that New Zealand will find itself the last to recover a semblance of societal sanity and ethics. It will struggle perhaps more than most to recover from mass formation for it is a particularly well known for conformity. Furthermore, while the rest of the World limps back to sanity, I suspect the New Zealand politicians will be studying very closely how not to, and how to avoid the inevitable fate befalling their dystopian counterparts elsewhere. The little hermetically sealed globlist experiment in the South Pacific must continue.
And so it does.
The novel inversion of “ethics” taking place under the Orwellian auspices of the New Zealand National Ethics Advisory Committee is astounding. This “ethics” takes non-compliance and consequent delegitimisation to a hitherto unseen level.
Never mind history. The pace of apocalyptic challenge is rapid and the assaults upon humanity, freedom and prosperity, numerous. We stumble on, trying to focus on the next impending assault, forgetting and overlooking the now that is immediately imperiling our own future.
Failure to comply with a jab mandate in “ethical” future envisaged by PM Ardern and her hench-women Kate Hannah, might well result in bribery, fines, the denial of medical treatment or access to a supermarket. Known as the ‘Intervention Ladder’ it represents an escalation of persuasive measures replete with a perverse, reverse coloured intensity. It is premeditated and murderously devastating and it is dependent on an as yet undescribed, untested synthetic polynucleotide sequence “vaccine” whose mass roll-out can now be accomplished in 100 days. It is also intrinsically dependent on intense psy-ops.
No rational compassionate, ethical individual would or could embrace such an assault. The assertion of an unequivocal demand for jab compliance and a complete surrender of bodily sovereignty to the State is as inhuman as it is inhumane. It is also unlawful, prohibited by all convention, and by multiple international agreements.
As Neil Oliver said, “What has been done has been done. What has be said, was said. I will not forget.”
And neither must we.