Time To Reap What Has Been Sown

Dr. Bruce Dooley MD – A man of courage

The phrase "Time to Reap What Has Been Sown" is often used in religious contexts to encourage believers to trust in the rewards of their past efforts and faith. It suggests that the time has come for individuals to see the positive outcomes of their previous actions and dedication. This concept is rooted in the idea that one's future consequences are inevitably shaped by their present actions, as stated in biblical verses like Galatians 6:9, which advises not to grow weary in doing good, for at the proper time one will reap a harvest if they do not give up.

Dr. Bruce Dooley. Image – FreeNZ Media / Screenshot.

“It would also have been very inconvenient for big Pharma and other unelected cabals if there was a viable alternative on the market.”

Daily Telegraph, New Zealand.

OF THAT THERE WAS CLEARLY NO NEED, as epidemiologists and others (Rancourt et al) have since amply demonstrated. No pandemic existed other than an invalid-case-based-deceptive-assault on personal liberty and corporeal sanctity that engineered the devastating imposition of a fraudulent, sickening and unpredictably lethal injected cocktail of uncertain composition and most certainly, of negative risk/benefit. The goal, as asserted by Dr David Martin in the EU Parliament, was a habituation of the global populace to shots. The pernicious ‘success’ of this global endeavour appears a democide of incomprehensible proportion, a corporate bonanza of unimaginable profit, a government and bureaucrats inebriated on power with several supranational entities now poised to act again in concert, tightening the ratchet of One World Administration. (Let us be clear here; there is no electable nor elected ‘One World’ anything. It is an ‘Administration’ without end, without legitimacy and most obviously, bereft ~ as all tyrannies are ~ of humanity).

Central to the bizarre seemingly incomprehensible and unethical behaviour of the NZ Medical Council (NZMC) is its fierce influence and assertion of control over ALL the other professional health boards, councils and disciplinary entities captured by and within the HPCA Act. Unsurprisingly, such subjugation appears persistently overlooked. Regrettably, the other HPCA professional entities appear well schooled, all critically, politically and socially subjugated. They remain conditioned, coerced and indifferent, and thus bereft of ethics. The ‘approved’ institutionalised medical policies may not be debated. Resistance is futile, deviation unacceptable and punishment severe. They are prohibited from even holding a discussion with patients around the subject of ‘vaccines’ as these necessarily are deemed to fall outside the ‘approved’, ‘scope of practice’. The crushing limitations thus imposed upon ethics, any intent to discover, academic study, the exercise of wider clinical expertise, and of deep research experience by the low wattage, sycophantic nodding professional appointees of Ministerial bureaucrats appears breathtaking, as is their ethically paradoxical but equally rigid enforcement and implementation of the DIE agenda.

Time To Restructure The HPCA Act To Actually Serve The Public It Alleges To Protect

Consequently, the HPCA Act requires urgent and dramatic restructuring to address the misuse and abuse of professional power and unethical influence by the NZMC and its in tandem Ministerial politics. As all professional Boards and Councils under the HPCA Act require Ministerial approval of appointments, this in turn guarantees alignment with thoroughly nefarious supranational policies together with the Pharma corruption seen in a biased and commercially restrained NZGOV that appears bereft of ethics.

The result? The excruciating and tyrannical meanderings of the NZMC delivered from the toxic tip of its professional needle.

So we must come to call for the definitive separation of State, Politics, Profession and Practice. The very people best suited to help here are those whom the Act alleges to “protect,” namely the wise and informed public who should have the capability of enlisting any and all ‘experts’ they so chose in a case placed before them. They should be the keystone of the platform on which the Act is based.

It is worth remarking once again that Health Minister Trevor Little amended the established tenets of the NZ Medicine Act in March 2021 to permit the expedition of a novel experimental intervention as a public health measure, when this should have remained (had the amendment not taken place) a controlled and limited practice confined to a small experimental group. The risible irony was and remains that his Party colleague, Finance Minister Grant Robertson signed off on the Pfizer liability waiver days BEFORE the data cut-off of the now thoroughly discredited Pfizer trial. The co-option of NZ Parliament in the implementation of draconian, unscientific, unethical practice appears as an enduring testament of impoverished ethics and the apparently invertebrate character of so many politicians. It appears a damning legacy with which the NZMC was in perfect collusive concordance.

“Hon. Grant Robertson, New Zealand Minister of Finance, signed-off Pfizer liability waivers apparently notifying the NZ parliament of the Pfizer and BioNTech indemnity on 22 November 2020, after granting it, astonishingly, to Pfizer on … 5 October 2020 … as reported, BEFORE the cited study data cut-off date of 9 October, 2020 (NEJM Dec 2020).”
https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/the-coagulation-of-evil

NZGOV (apparently co-opted by the WHO/WEF/UNEP cabal) clearly abrogated international convention, while imposing an immoral faux-choice that ‘legally’ deprived people of their livelihoods.

United Nations, Economic and Social Council (UN ECOSOC), Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/1985/4, Annex (1985).
https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/chaos-history-and-the-now
Whilst these Principles “allowed” for a brief and measured derogation of freedoms it nonetheless remained explicit and sacrosanct that such derogations NEVER permitted medical or scientific experimentation without FREE CONSENT. “These rights are not derogable under any conditions even for the asserted purpose of preserving the life of the nation.”

Fully informed consent was by definition therefore, in this contrived and repellent scenario, utterly impossible.

And here lies the exposure of the over-reach of the NZGOV and its supranational conspirators. As the NZ National Ethics Advisory Committee (NEAC) revealed in their 2023 Survey commissioned by the NZ Ministry of Health (MOH), New Zealanders and their institutions have little stomach for the debasement of the established norms of ethics. As NEAC stated, therein lies the genuine threat of a withdrawal of social license and submission to Governance. This is of course every politicians’ trembling fear and one fear clearly expressed in the published minutes of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet in 2020 as Ardern and Bloomfield foundered on the resistance to their lock-down of Auckland and the inability of all the District Health Boards to reach their unscientific, ideologically and tyrannically imposed 90% “vaccinated” goal.
https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/fixated-on-fear

Post Script

NZGOV and its corporate/private sponsors were warned in crystalline terms by NEAC. Meanwhile, Dr Bruce Dooley and all of those at NZDSOS are leading and lighting the way, showing the populace of New Zealand that the derogation of established ethics with its dire consequences and sought after tyranny, if unchecked, potentially moves (as Mattias Desmet suggested) the government, bureaucrats and wider healthcare into a domain of outright of atrocity.

Indeed, many would suggest that this may have already taken place.