This remarkable analysis is a Rosetta Stone forward in the fight. Thank you for the huge time and effort you must put into such a piece. Please submit it to Brownstone for publication. Blessings
In the USA, the courts like to refer to the Jacobson case but that case only imposed a fine of about $200 in today's dollars.
Yet, somehow they interpreted that case to allow for removal from work or school which is NOT WHAT JACOBSON SAID.
For some reason lawyers even on the side of challenging mandates ignore this and recently they won a case that Jacobson doesn't apply to the COVID shots because they were not effective.
Again, it should not matter whether the shots work or not. Even if they were effective😅 Jacobson only justified a FINE.
I'm not happy with the legal profession ignoring that simple fact and it almost seems like they're blinded by false history or perhaps see more money in not settling the point that Jacobson never really allowed for restrictions (like a moving violation of driving which is technically a criminal punishment) vs a fine (like a parking ticket which is a civil judgement).
This remarkable analysis is a Rosetta Stone forward in the fight. Thank you for the huge time and effort you must put into such a piece. Please submit it to Brownstone for publication. Blessings
The Nuremberg code should also apply to so called approved past vaccines too.
They weren't properly tested as many of them used other vaccines as placebo which is nefarious.
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/and-like-that-the-claim-vaccines
In the USA, the courts like to refer to the Jacobson case but that case only imposed a fine of about $200 in today's dollars.
Yet, somehow they interpreted that case to allow for removal from work or school which is NOT WHAT JACOBSON SAID.
For some reason lawyers even on the side of challenging mandates ignore this and recently they won a case that Jacobson doesn't apply to the COVID shots because they were not effective.
Again, it should not matter whether the shots work or not. Even if they were effective😅 Jacobson only justified a FINE.
I'm not happy with the legal profession ignoring that simple fact and it almost seems like they're blinded by false history or perhaps see more money in not settling the point that Jacobson never really allowed for restrictions (like a moving violation of driving which is technically a criminal punishment) vs a fine (like a parking ticket which is a civil judgement).
'They weren't properly tested as many of them used other vaccines as placebo which is nefarious'.
In which case they remain 'experimental' and informed consent cannot be rendered?
All vaccines are neurotoxic. Every single one children take since birth! I’ve known this for 32 years.
Brilliant
the masochist pleaded to the sadist, "Hit me..."
the sadist replied,
"No."