Demons, Crisis, And Delusion

When Peer Review At Pregnant People Fails

The doyens of vaxx, BigPharma, BioTech, Academe, and their enabling politicians reside in a hermetically sealed echo chamber by preference. Dr Madhava Setty attending the gloriously funded World Vaccination Congress recently and higlighted their collective position in a fascinating interview worth watching (published 8th April, 2023 ~ 39 mins).

Much of what is discussed and many of the insights revealed are both predictable and anticipated. Some are not. Indeed, it becomes seemingly and superficially clear that, in his words,

“there’s no body driving the bus … collective group think .. no critical thought .. cannot imagine they are wrong …”

This might be summed up as ‘useful idiots’, only these folk are not idiots by anyone’s estimation, wilfully blind perhaps, but not idiots.

Perhaps that may be true of the conference assembly. Nonetheless, it is hard not to conclude that they are being psy-opped, steered, guided and utilised to further political ends by their handlers, those winking hoods at the WEF in general and CEPI in particular.

Dr Madhava Setty commented that certainty is not clarity. Absolute certainty in this BigPharma/BigTech conference derives from and is reinforced by the enormous affluence swilling about, coupling to the circular sureness of corporate identity exhibited by BigTech/BigPharma/BigGOVMed.

“They believe they are doing the right thing, they believe that they have successfully ended the pandemic, and they are dumbfounded by the antivaxx movement.” “

They perceive vaccine hesitancy is the greatest challenge now. What can we do differently?” [they ask]

A key question posed at the conference was whether it would be useful to have the anti-vaxx position presented by their spokesmen, their experts in the field, the scientists and medical individuals, the ethicists and public health exponents who are apparently fueling the ‘hesitancy’? Should their dissent not be confidently and warmly embraced by the devotees of BigPharma, a welcomed debate in which they may be publicly dismantled?

The formal response is NEVER to accord such people a public space or platform (unsurprisingly, from an unnamed Australian chair of the panel). That would be a mistake. To do so would be to grant them legitimacy in the eyes of the public.

Dr Andrew Wakefield was labeled as devastatingly dangerous, with the farcical suggestion made that perhaps a rumour should be started that graphene oxide is found in ivermectin. Much laughter ensued.

Delegitimisation and stonewalling, SOP of this moment, unconscious or deliberate, this has become an habitual enculturated position for institutions and individuals. In its way, it is a categorical mark of the end of civilisation, unless we chose differently.

Pivoting …

“I Was Just Following Orders,” also known as the Nuremberg Defence, refers to a plea in a court of law used by persons not to be held guilty for actions ordered by their superiors.

The legitimacy of orders appears as relevant as the illegitimacy of a government and its perverted instructions, warring illegitimately against its own people, over turning established ethics and implementing “experimental medical treatment” in the absence of fully informed consent, a matter arguably of grievous bodily assault ~ Injuring with intent to cause grievous bodily harm (Section 189(1) Crimes Act 1961)

The three criteria of Injuring with intent to cause grievous bodily harm appear fulfilled:

1. Yes, the government mandated shots

2. Yes, Pfizer injections resulted in death and sickness

3. Yes. The MOH and NZGOV were well appraised of the risks and consequences of their actions. They simply could not be.

Further detailed "revelations" emerge concerning the duplicitous nature of the Pfizer study

Did you consider the central ‘brain’ at the New Zealand Ministry Of Health and MedSafe (or elsewhere in the echelons of New Zealand power), those associated politicians, whether any of these ever came close to drilling into the initial Pfizer study or indeed have necessarily closely reviewed developments since? Does it in fact matter? Do you think that having granted a waiver of liability, politicians and ‘health’ officials no longer bother to seriously and intensively scrutinize any mRNA/LNP product BigPharma deliver? What’s the point they think? Obviously, the targeted groups of their intervention are not chief amongst their deliberations, other than to continue to jab as many men, women, children, infants, pregnant women as possible.

New Zealand, Grant Robertson signed the Pfizer and BioNTech waivers of liability in October and December 2020, theoretically as blind as the bats that are being ludicrously claimed as the natural source of the narrative, from one of the most tightly run “virus” narrative generators, the BBC:

“A natural origin is still the more likely theory, said Professor David Robertson, head of viral genomics and bioinformatics at the University of Glasgow.

"There's been an accumulation of evidence (what we know about the viruses biology, the close variants circulating in bats and locations of early human cases) that firmly points to a natural origin centred on the Huanan market in Wuhan city,"

If politicians and an appointed medical elite were aware of harm, it did not appear to stop them enforcing and recommending injections, denying exemptions and further, denying exemptions after horrible life threatening adverse events to the first shot.

Over a barrelled needle, or lose your job, so it went.

Meanwhile, Moderna has been compelled to release 24,000 pages of documents - Aaron Siri strikes again! (Attorney @AaronSiriSG , was responsible for the release of the Pfizer documents, also has a pending lawsuit against Moderna).

The Pfizer documents have been damning. You have not heard a whisper about this from health authorities who have no choice but to continue to the con, oddly barring Switzerland (see Dead Man Talking) … home of Davos Man.

“Switzerland stops the Covid vaccinations: all vaccination recommendations have been withdrawn, doctors can only administer the controversial vaccines in individual cases under certain conditions - but then bear the risk of liability for vaccination damage.”

Can you imagine that taking place in the GOV/MSM dictatorship of New Zealand?

Elsewhere detailed reports are available (June 2022) ~ Pfizer Vaccine Documents Released by FDA Expose More Negative Issues

The documents show that Pfizer was well aware of the presence of natural antibodies during their experiments: natural immunity. They knew that the natural antibodies (the antibodies that recover from infection with C-19) were 100% effective. But in the conclusion, the paper says that the final efficacy results showed that with or without evidence of prior infection, the Pfizer vaccine provided protection for both participants.

Moreover, after the first dose of the vaccine, the white blood cells in the vaccine recipient’s body drop significantly because the immune system is affected. The vaccine increases the chance of infection up to 7 days after vaccination.

Pfizer also documented that the first adverse event associated with the vaccine was 1P36 Deletion Syndrome. This is a congenital genetic disorder that affects fetuses and deletes parts of their chromosomes, causing them to be born with severe intellectual disabilities.

A survey of official government data found that people fully vaccinated with Pfizer were up to three times more likely to contract Covid-19, two times more likely to be hospitalized with Covid-19, and three times more likely to die from Covid-19 than those who were not vaccinated. Translated into human terms, this means that the more you get vaccinated, the more likely you are to become infected.

The documents show that in February 2021 Pfizer and the FDA were aware of the existence of VAED (antibody-dependent enhancement effect), and they both knew that vaccine-related enhancement disease was a possible outcome of mRNA vaccination.

And so the charade lingers and lurches on.

Segue Back To December 2020

I personally noted the following apparent discrepancy back in Dec 2020 in the initial NEJM Pfizer study, commenting on the matter to nzdsos.com

It occurs around the Adverse Events Table S3. (Supplementary Appendix) Participants Reporting at Least 1 Adverse Event from Dose 1 (All Enrolled Participants). BNT162b2 (30μg) (n=21621), Placebo (n=21631), [N=43252].

While on pp2608 of the primary article it is stated under the heading ‘Adverse Events’: “Adverse event analyses are provided for ALL enrolled 43252 participants, with variable follow-up time after dose 1 (Table S3 ~ Appendix). More BNT162b2 recipients than placebo recipients reported any adverse event (27% and 12%, respectively) or a related adverse event (21% and 5%).”

However, in the (Abstract) Results, it is stated that: “A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo.”

Adverse Events Table S3 (Appendix) therefore does not appear to include 196 participants

I recently raised this question with the team at OpenVAET’s Substack who were unable answer precisely. The helpful truncated reply:

Thanks for your feedback. There are countless discrepancies in the documents, some more serious than others.

It is appalling that an NEJM reviewer did not appear to detect this elementary discrepancy or indeed apparently anyone at the New Zealand Ministry of Health or at MedSafe. Then again, perhaps they did and decided it was unimportant? You will be able to assess this for yourself in a moment.

As a reviewer and someone who has held an editorial role, it is a potential red flag. If table totals, article totals and abstract totals do not match, a clear signal of concern exists, particularly if nigh on 200 disappear from the adverse reactions table.

That number is potentially highly significant. There were 240 severe adverse events in the injection group and 139 in the placebo group; 21 severe events were deemed ‘life threatening’ in the intervention group while 24 were deemed ‘life threatening’ in the placebo group.

Classified under a separate lower heading, ‘Any serious adverse event’ there were 126 in the intervention group and 111 in the placebo group.

Given these data and the further serious uncertainty of 196 missing, an incredibly salient number and magnitude in context, I cannot imagine why the Pfizer shot was ever considered ‘safe’. /rhet /sarc

“A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 (30 μg per dose, given 21 days apart) was found to be safe and 95% effective against Covid-19.”

The NEJM article goes on to chillingly state toward the end of the Discussion:

“The data presented in this report have significance beyond the performance of this vaccine candidate.” 

And the Discussion goes on to unwittingly highlight how Pfizer played loose and fast with the truth, hiding behind implicit language:

The severe case split provides preliminary evidence of vaccine-mediated protection against severe disease, alleviating many of the theoretical concerns over vaccine-mediated disease enhancement.

But as written earlier in this piece,

The [Pfizer release] documents show that in February 2021 Pfizer and the FDA were aware of the existence of VAED (antibody-dependent enhancement effect), and they both knew that vaccine-related enhancement disease was a possible outcome of mRNA vaccination.

And a further lie,

The results demonstrate that Covid-19 can be prevented by immunization, provide proof of concept that RNA-based vaccines are a promising new approach for protecting humans against infectious diseases, and demonstrate the speed with which an RNA-based vaccine can be developed with a sufficient investment of resources. 

“Proof of concept” … a failure to prevent transmission or infection, to mitigate severe disease (exactly the opposite throughout) is a joke were it not mortally serious; “Promising” … meaning there’s a long long way to go yet.

In truth, the technology never really left the blocks and it is marooned in abyss of deceit and death being promoted, expedited and instigated by WEF/CEPI/WHO and your local hubris addled politicians and health officials

This rigorous demonstration of safety and efficacy less than 11 months later provides a practical demonstration that RNA-based vaccines, which require only viral genetic sequence information to initiate development, are a major new tool to combat pandemics and other infectious disease outbreaks. 

And Of the 196 absentee serious adverse events…

Did they die? Who knows.

Pfizer has infinite resources and $billions more to date, a superb range of personnel to generate the required language, articles and product. It is astonishing that errors such went undetected, not only by them but by the NEJM.

One might well speculate that the journal of 'pregnant people' was literally beside itself to publish. After all, it was Christmas.

www.bobmoran.co.uk

Post Script

Always overlooked; please remember this.

The unpredictability also accounts for an inability to determine whether a jab recipient will develop an adverse event, a life long health span compromising condition (for example, hypertension, or an autoimmune condition, or cancer) or simply become another ‘victim’ of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome in a few months, or perish immediately.

UNSAFE, INEFFECTIVE, UNPREDICTABLE

The synthetic polynucleotide/LNP shot is UNPREDICTABLE.

Evolution of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody and IgG Avidity Post Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Vaccinations

K. Bliden, T. Liu, H. Dai et al. Published 2 July 2021. DOI:10.1101/2021.06.28.21259338

“We did observe highly variable immune responses including those with well below average anto-RBD IgG levels and avidity. It is therefore important to monitor immune responses at the individuaised and personalized level, ….”

All of this terrible charade is a novel and radical departure from political, ethical, scientific and medical established norms.

In my view THIS IS THE PILOT Psycho-Social STUDY.

A pilot psychosocial experiment, arguably one of the most Machiavellian and evil undertakings in history, exceptionally well funded (undisclosed) involving more than 9000 people (see Yale study, James et al. 2021) was conducted BEFORE a “vaccine” was available:

Participants and Procedure I. Participants were recruited by the vendor Luc.id to take a survey. Of those who were recruited, 4,361 participants completed the survey. Participants and Procedure. Participants II (n = 5,014) were recruited by the vendor YouGov/Polimetrix.

The results of this study were discussed previously:

Hubris Precedes Calamity

They were used to to explore the means and limitations of the con, of compliance, coercion and social peer pressure. One possible interpretation of what we are witnessing is an expression of the twin idea of cull and control (a double benefit hallmark), both expedited and instigated without disturbing the hive. The constraints of these actions have been explored and rendered measurable and visible.

The orchestrators have expedited, instigated and tested the requisite elements: the shots, lock downs, social distancing, masks, school closures, company policy, loss of jobs, rules and constraints, compliance, while the expediters (politicians, medics, bureaucrats, municipal authorities, police et al) have enacted and overseen the enforcement. And yes, the excess deaths above the 2015 - 2019 mean continue at ~ 15% per week in New Zealand to date (oecd.stat).

To date then, they have been rather successful.

Meanwhile, Round 2 is in potentially in the offing replete with a modified ethical code that used a Ladder Of Intervention Coercion condoning the use of bribes and fines, of denial of access to medical treatment and to groceries, all in little New Zealand, once blithely and arrogantly referred to as God’s Zone.

Only, this time the hive IS more perturbed and unforeseen consequences are beginning to expose the hubris laden elitist chancre that is the WEF. Now it is a race to the finishing tape, a race of awareness against tyranny, of humanity against biotechnofascism

It'll be close.