International Commentary
While New Zealand State And National Media, Politicians, And Institutional Leaders Identify As Church Mice.
All Tickety Boo Downunder.
As reported by the latest commentary in Brownstone Institute, State Power and Covid Crimes: Part 2, by Prof. Ramesh Thakur, former United Nations Assistant Secretary-General, and emeritus professor in the Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University ~ January 3, 2023 Policy, Vaccines
~ Australia hit the 50 percent vaccination threshold on 11 October 2021, with the Covid death total being 1,461 on that date. The mortality toll was 16,964 on 28 December 2022. Thus 10.6 times as many Australians died with Covid in the 14 months since 50 percent were double-vaccinated as in 19 months until then.
~ For what it’s worth, New Zealand’s experience has been even worse. Its Covid death toll as at 28 December was 2,331, some 78 times higher than the 30 dead at the 50 percent vaccination mark, and 57 times higher than 41 dead at 70 percent vaccination.
Meanwhile, excess weekly mortality in New Zealand escalated into the stratosphere.
It will be fascinating when the OECD.stats are updated beyond week 44 to properly complete the year just what the final graph and cumulative total of excess weekly mortality in New Zealand shows ~ further conformation of unsafe and ineffective to a media choir of church mice?
How anyone can look at the Covid vaccination and mortality metrics of New Zealand, Australia, and Japan and still hold fast to the ‘safe and effective’ vaccine narrative is beyond comprehension. Instead, one more initially plausible hypothesis is that the behaviour of the virus is Covid vaccine-invariant, and a second hypothesis is that the vaccine may actually be driving infections, serious illness and deaths by some mysterious mechanism not yet identified by scientists – although some studies are starting to point the way.
Post Script
First, as we know 'cases' absolutely do not define 'COVID'. Smilarly, dying with/of COVD or being admitted to hospital with a gunshot wound, or ingrown toenail, or motorcar accident or whatever, and a positive RAT test, determines that you counted as a hospitalised COVID case.
The latter is a list of non-specific clinical symptoms (defined by the WHO ~ (WHO COVID-19: Case Definitions Updated in Public health surveillance for COVID-19, published 16 December 2020).
The only “distinguishing” features are imaging (that show acute pneumonia) coupled with a +ve RT-PCR / RAT test for a few fragments of nucleotide sequences that are, uncontrolled, pre-selected and ubiquitous in the environment.
Second, as death in NZ (July 2021) hospital occurs at x12 the rate in the jabbed v unjabbed (but at the same ratio), aren't we seeing an expression of a similar proportion of jabbed / unjabbed in the population (~90% v 10% ~ eligible jabbees)?
Third, there is no generalisable response to an experimental synthetic polynucleotide sequence and its conglomerate of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). A study comparing Pfizer/Moderna jabs reported: "We did observe highly variable immune responses including those with well below average anti-RBD IgG levels and avidity." (Bliden et al. 2021). However, a generic adverse response may arise from the severe inflammatory response engendered by the lipid nano particles (LNP) envelope.
Fourth, Israeli data demonstrated abject uselessness, an "effectiveness" absolute risk reduction (ARR) of an infinitesimal 0.46% and an numbers needed to ‘vaccinate’ to get a single successful ‘ vacinee’ (NNV) of 217. (Dagan N, Barda N, Kepten E, et al. BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a nationwide mass vaccination setting. N Engl J Med 2021; published online Feb 24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2101765 cited by, Piero Olliaro, Els Torreele, Michel Vaillant, www.thelancet.com/microbe Vol 2 July 2021: COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant (not) in the room).
Fifth, given (4) and the observed absence of effectiveness (which we now all know and is established and recognised), the direct adverse consequence of the jabs are simply terrible, "Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination." (The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy" (retracted but reconfigured and available on ResearchGate) Walach, H.; Klement, R.J.; Aukema,W. The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink thePolicy. Vaccines 2021, 9, 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9070693)
Sixth. By the time you reach this point in the rebuttal, you will be met by vitriol and eye-rolling, sprinkled with ad hominems, all standard fare for Alinsky-esque delegitimisation promoted by the Orwellian, New Zealand Disinformation Project. A further response is to highlight the widespread institutional ditching of science (no controls) and endorsement of an absence of ethics and active, unconsented, coerced and mandated medical experimentation.
Raising the concerns already expressed to the Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (the globalist corporate injection developers) and the very “safety” platform it funds, the Brighton Collaboration, expressed at the outset in March 2020 from conference proceedings (P.-H. Lambert, D. M. Ambrosino, S. R. Andersen et al., Consensus summary report for CEPI/BCMarch 12–13, 2020 meeting: Assessment of risk of disease enhancement with COVID-19 vaccines, Vaccine, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.064).
Further, the dire consequences described in: Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs Stephanie Seneff, Greg Nigh, Anthony M. Kyriakopoulos, Peter A. McCullough (2022), and the latest utterly awful IgG4 Related Disease (Nambiar & Oliver 2022) that dodges mentioning the “vaccine” all point to an injection induced cataclysm.
Seventh. Then there's the damning report issued by Pfizer with its 9 page appendix of 1200 "adverse events of special interest," 'BNT162b2 ~ 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports' readily available on the net.
Eighth: Systemic IgG response is not useful for an alleged "respiratory challenge" dependent on IgA membrane bound defense. And now we see IgG4 related disease (6): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499825/
Ninth: Review 'Terrain Theory' (introduction) in the context the absence of a properly and scientifically demonstrated pathogenic 'virus' with suitable provenance and controls ~ Dr Mark Bailey ~ https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
One could go on and on…, but I think you get the point.
Unfortunately nobody cares about data. The only thing that will matter is body bags. When enough people see the bodies piling up in their own small circle, then things might change. A good analogy is the Vietnam War in the US. Ten years of data, protest, etc, did nothing to change or stop the war. It was only when the deaths started hitting families and were too difficult to hide anymore that things changed. Ten years. We would be lucky to only have to drag out this covid madness for ten years. God has His plan.
Why limit yourself to two pieces of evidence when you can have 200?! https://metatron.substack.com/p/the-covid-vaccine-saved-millions