Thanks for this! I understand the distinction you’re making with the hospitalised cases ratios, but surely the jab fanatics will simply point to the “cases” to hospitalisation ratios and proclaim, “see, the percentage of unjabbed that ended up in hospital are waaaay higher than the jabbed. Look! All these vaxxed cases that didn’t end up in hospital!”
First, as you know 'cases' do not define 'COVID'. The latter is a list of non-specific clinical symptoms (defined by the WHO ~ (WHO COVID-19: Case Definitions Updated in Public health surveillance for COVID-19, published 16 December 2020), the only distinguishing features allegedly CR/ U/S CT (that merely show acute pneumonia) and a +ve RT-PCR / RAT test for a few fragments of nucleotide sequences that are, uncontrolled, pre-selected and ubiquitous in the environment.
Second, as death in NZ (July 2021) hospital occurs at x12 the rate in the jabbed v unjabbed (but at the same ratio) aren't we seeing an expression of a similar proportion of jabbed / unjabbed in the population (90% v 10% ~ eligible jabbees MOH)?
Third, there is no generic, generalisable response to an experimental synthetic polynucleotide sequence and its conglomerate of LNPs. A study comparing Pfizer/Moderna jabs reported: "We did observe highly variable immune responses including those with well below average anti-RBD IgG levels and avidity." (Bliden et al. 2021). ... except perhaps the severe inflammatory response engendered by the LNPs.
Fourth, Israeli data demonstrated abject uselessness, an "effectiveness" ARR of 0.46% and an NNV of 217. Dagan N, Barda N, Kepten E, et al. BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a nationwide mass vaccination setting. N Engl J Med 2021; published online Feb 24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2101765 cited by, Piero Olliaro, Els Torreele, Michel Vaillant, www.thelancet.com/microbe Vol 2 July 2021: COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant (not) in the room.
Fifth, given (4) absence of effectiveness, the direct consequence of the jabs are terrible, "Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination." The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy" (retracted but reconfigured and available on ResearchGate) Walach, H.; Klement, R.J.; Aukema,W. The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink thePolicy. Vaccines 2021, 9, 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9070693
Sixth. By the time you reach this point the rebuttal will be met by ad hominem. I usually respond with the ditching of science (no controls) ethics and medical experimentation, and raise the concerns expressed to CEPI/BC at the outset in March 2020: P.-H. Lambert, D. M. Ambrosino, S. R. Andersen et al., Consensus summary report for CEPI/BCMarch 12–13, 2020 meeting: Assessment of risk of disease enhancement with COVID-19 vaccines, Vaccine, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.064 and the dire consequences described by: Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs Stephanie Seneff, Greg Nigh, Anthony M. Kyriakopoulos, Peter A. McCullough.
Seventh. Then there's the damning report issued by Pfizer with its 9 page appendix of 1200 "adverse events of special interest" 'BNT162b2 ~ 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports' available on the net.
Eigth: Systemic IgG response is not useful for an alleged "respiratory challenge" dependent on IgA membrane bound defense. And now we see IgG4 related disease: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499825/
Thank you Joel.
Source data was provided as an appendix.pdf by MOH.
Link to https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/new-zealand-moh-data
shows calculation from MOH data.
Have you got a link to the source data? Did you calculate the rates per vaxxed/unvaxxed populations?
Thanks for this! I understand the distinction you’re making with the hospitalised cases ratios, but surely the jab fanatics will simply point to the “cases” to hospitalisation ratios and proclaim, “see, the percentage of unjabbed that ended up in hospital are waaaay higher than the jabbed. Look! All these vaxxed cases that didn’t end up in hospital!”
Not quite sure how one rebuts that...
First, as you know 'cases' do not define 'COVID'. The latter is a list of non-specific clinical symptoms (defined by the WHO ~ (WHO COVID-19: Case Definitions Updated in Public health surveillance for COVID-19, published 16 December 2020), the only distinguishing features allegedly CR/ U/S CT (that merely show acute pneumonia) and a +ve RT-PCR / RAT test for a few fragments of nucleotide sequences that are, uncontrolled, pre-selected and ubiquitous in the environment.
Second, as death in NZ (July 2021) hospital occurs at x12 the rate in the jabbed v unjabbed (but at the same ratio) aren't we seeing an expression of a similar proportion of jabbed / unjabbed in the population (90% v 10% ~ eligible jabbees MOH)?
Third, there is no generic, generalisable response to an experimental synthetic polynucleotide sequence and its conglomerate of LNPs. A study comparing Pfizer/Moderna jabs reported: "We did observe highly variable immune responses including those with well below average anti-RBD IgG levels and avidity." (Bliden et al. 2021). ... except perhaps the severe inflammatory response engendered by the LNPs.
Fourth, Israeli data demonstrated abject uselessness, an "effectiveness" ARR of 0.46% and an NNV of 217. Dagan N, Barda N, Kepten E, et al. BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a nationwide mass vaccination setting. N Engl J Med 2021; published online Feb 24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2101765 cited by, Piero Olliaro, Els Torreele, Michel Vaillant, www.thelancet.com/microbe Vol 2 July 2021: COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant (not) in the room.
Fifth, given (4) absence of effectiveness, the direct consequence of the jabs are terrible, "Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination." The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy" (retracted but reconfigured and available on ResearchGate) Walach, H.; Klement, R.J.; Aukema,W. The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink thePolicy. Vaccines 2021, 9, 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9070693
Sixth. By the time you reach this point the rebuttal will be met by ad hominem. I usually respond with the ditching of science (no controls) ethics and medical experimentation, and raise the concerns expressed to CEPI/BC at the outset in March 2020: P.-H. Lambert, D. M. Ambrosino, S. R. Andersen et al., Consensus summary report for CEPI/BCMarch 12–13, 2020 meeting: Assessment of risk of disease enhancement with COVID-19 vaccines, Vaccine, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.064 and the dire consequences described by: Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs Stephanie Seneff, Greg Nigh, Anthony M. Kyriakopoulos, Peter A. McCullough.
Seventh. Then there's the damning report issued by Pfizer with its 9 page appendix of 1200 "adverse events of special interest" 'BNT162b2 ~ 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports' available on the net.
Eigth: Systemic IgG response is not useful for an alleged "respiratory challenge" dependent on IgA membrane bound defense. And now we see IgG4 related disease: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499825/
Ninth: Review 'Terrain Theory' in the context the the absence to demonstrate a pathogenic 'virus' with suitable provenance and controls ~ Dr Mark Bailey ~ https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
Great work. I am unfortunately not academic enough to be of much help, but nothing surprises me anymore.