A short span of time ago this hapless individual who happens to be a man would have been laughed out of the room, out of office and probably out of the country. He would have become a wandering pariah in perpetual exile. This is priceless, as is the demise of wider politics and its relevance to sanity and reality. It has a bearing on many other things not least, the elephant in the room.
NZ Prime Minister Chris Hipkins was asked 'what is a woman?'
“How do you, and how does this government define a woman?”
“Ummm, … to be honest Shaun that question has come slightly out of left field for me. The…. well, biology, sex, gender, ummm … people define themselves, people define their own genders…”
Current NZ Ministry of Health consequences of “vaccination”
26 February 2020 to 3 April 2023
Total hospitalisations (Table 1 ~ “for COVID”): 26969 @10.8% (2912) nil a priori jabs = 24057 total hospitalised jabbed.
Deaths
Current cumulative deaths in “case” +ve individuals (MOH data) in receipt of any number of jabs = 4015 (Table 2)
Nil jabbed individuals deaths = MOH do not report this value
NZ MOH state (03/04/2023) elsewhere that 2,687 people have died of COVID-19 (or it was a contributing factor). The assumption here is that this number is captured within the over propagandized hospitalised 4015 alleged “COVID” deaths.
Therefore 1328 deaths (4015 ⎻ 2687) were ‘with’, not ‘of’, highlighting that in the NZ population of 5.2M a fatality rate of ~ 0.03% exists (3 in 10,000) or 300 in a million, in relation to the alleged “COVID".
Now let’s look briefly elsewhere where mRNA/LNP jabs (Pfizer & Moderna) were widely used ~ Qatar.
Elsewhere (Nature.com) reporting on Qatar:
Lack of clear and universally accepted criteria are a major limitation in assessing COVID-19 vaccine related deaths
And keep in mind the Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS) (Lazarus, 2009) … also commented on here
Lazarus (Harvard-Pilgrim study) stated:
Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.
Nature.com reported from Qatar (2023):
The death rate among those with high probability of relationship to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was 0.34/100,000 [3 in a million] unique vaccine recipients, while death rate among those with either high or intermediate probability of relationship to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was 0.98/100,000 [10 in a million] unique vaccine recipients. In conclusion, deaths attributable to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are extremely rare and lower than the overall crude mortality rate in Qatar.
Based on established under reporting (<1%) we can see that anywhere between 300 and 1000 potentially die from the shots, equal to or far in excess of those allegedly currently dead from “COVID” in New Zealand.
So let’s improvise and see whether we can arrive at a sensible estimate of the number for the MOH unreported deaths in those nil jabbed.
Noting the previously established near perfect concordance between Hospitalised/Death Ratio for Any/All Shots and Nil Shots; (Pearson correlation: R = 0.9791; p < .01), with these ratios observed to remain consistent across a six month period NZ MOH (Feb 2022 - JUL 2022) of hospitalisation data, (prior, there were insufficient data to highlight the observations) possessing a mean value of 5.705 (range 3.5 - 7.1).
Keep this in mind. I use this previously derived ratio (5.705) to check against the current MOH data derived ratio of 5.99, which shows good concordance. It thus appears reasonable to use whatever the current ratio is to derive unknown, withheld data. The ratio stems from the obvious, that the shots are ineffective, as discussed previously.
We know that:
The current MOH data states 24057 jab recipients and 4015 case +ve deaths (ratio: 5.99)
The MOH also confusingly states elsewhere that there are 2687 “COVID” deaths
To The Estimate
Total current cumulative number of hospitalisations: 26969 has a total of number of deaths of 4015 associated with the number (24057) jabbed).
The number of deaths associated with the unjabbed (2912) is unstated.
Using the current 5.99 ratio (24057/4015), one inference is that an estimated 487 unjabbed individuals died (2912/5.99) (this data is witheld by MOH)
Therefore, approximately 0.00937% (487) unjabbed of the total 5.2M NZ population have died, compared with 0.08% (4015) ~ 8.5 times more likely.
However, as NZ MOH have stated elsewhere (03/04/2023), 2687 (0.052%) people died of COVID-19 (or it was a contributing factor).
Confused?
The New Zealand the cumulative data 26 February 2020 to 3 April 2023 suggests:
Of the jabbed 24057 hospitalisations, 4015 (~17%) died.
Of the unjabbed 2912 hospitalisations, 487 (~17%) died.
Rebadged hospitalisations anyone?
We keep in mind that the jabs are ineffective (negative risk benefit), elicit unpredictable individual physiological and immunological consequences and are fundamentally unsafe and unethical, by all previous standards and metrics.
As further time passes, the longer term consequences of the jabs will continue to emerge, as the data regarding excess mortality above the mean continues to do so. Those that continue to stonewall will look increasingly like the snake oil peddlers that they are.
Post Script
New Zealand PM proved himself incapable of proffering a definition of a woman either for himself or on behalf of his government. I think it appears reasonable to assume he and they may well struggle to define a man.
These snake oil peddlers expose themselves as political and manifest invertebrates, mesmerised and transfixed by the rainbows of neo-Marxist critical race theory, and corporate globalist monomania.