Dissent ≠ Disinformation; Sanity ≠ Insanity
This essay is a worthy contribution to the litany of skeptical observations.
(btw, I think you meant populace, not populous, at the beginning of the "Uncontrolled ...Experiment" section.
Thank you for your generous remark. Oh dang! The typo is corrected. Peer review is a valuable contribution that I miss in this milieu.
Re: "the litany of skeptical observations," indeed, a damning and quite possibly unending litany if, as CEPI, Moderna et al. apparently intend, the utilisation of the mRNA platform is ubiquitous, please see: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/in-case-you-didnt-know?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=516896&post_id=90609658&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
AND
"Disease X" & The Alchemy Of 100 Days
https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/disease-x-and-the-alchemy-of-100
This essay is a worthy contribution to the litany of skeptical observations.
(btw, I think you meant populace, not populous, at the beginning of the "Uncontrolled ...Experiment" section.
Thank you for your generous remark. Oh dang! The typo is corrected. Peer review is a valuable contribution that I miss in this milieu.
Re: "the litany of skeptical observations," indeed, a damning and quite possibly unending litany if, as CEPI, Moderna et al. apparently intend, the utilisation of the mRNA platform is ubiquitous, please see: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/in-case-you-didnt-know?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=516896&post_id=90609658&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
AND
"Disease X" & The Alchemy Of 100 Days
https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/disease-x-and-the-alchemy-of-100