Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Honeybee's avatar

I understand how thinking can incorporate a view that no collapse occurred in the USSR. However, I don't believe much value arises from this postulation. I don't see the fight as an über-alles Marxism overtaking the world but rather a skillful play by highly placed individuals orchestrating power through financial control. Who are these individuals? They largely play behind the scenes but a few may sit, e.g., on the Vanguard Board of Directors who remain nameless. Their agenda has been revealed through the WEF's mission. Please view this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkjbrnX8rl8 The man is succinct and correct.

I also quote "Stratfor Global Intelligence: The Rise and the Fall of the Russian Oligarchs": "Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Russia looked more like the American Wild West than a once-global Eurasian power. There were few clear rules and ample opportunities for financial and political gain — legal and otherwise — as well as a number of shrewd, larger-than-life personalities who could take advantage of those opportunities. Before Vladimir Putin took control of the government in 1999, an array of factions fought for control of the country’s wealth, industries and politics, principal among them the siloviki, “The Family” and the oligarchs." https://web.archive.org/web/20201112030231/https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/attach/144/144365_RussianoligarchPDF.pdf

U.S.S.R. was "collapsed" to affect its financial takeover.

Expand full comment
Kitsune, Maskless Crusader.'s avatar

Orwell’s quote seems to be self evident. I do not recall that particular quote but have been restating the obvious as too few see it. Others doing the same has drawn us together here on Substack.

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts