I don't think there is a shortage of information that lays out the effects, potential damage and injury and death from a the biomedical perspective. Then we have Pfizer's own 6mo cumulative report (Feb 2021) and its appendix of >1200 adverse events of special interest. That makes a sound start.
PM studies (Germany and Italy) confirm biomedical hypotheses and observations showing organ effects of auto-inflammatory 'spike' protein. German studies suggest as many as 1:800 may be sickened, though some suggest this may be more like 1:300. Hospital data (ICU, death) in vaxxed / unvaxxed seems self-evident now. SADS, cancers, autoimmune conditions, along with myo/pericarditis in children and younger adults and others ... on and on it all goes.... and all for just what exactly?
Then eventually, having got through all of the above and passed the legion of irregularities associated with mensis and escalating infertility we arrive at excess deaths, seen across countries emboldened by BigPharma and its novel synthetic nucleotide sequence jabs.
Not a good picture to be seen there either.
Now to the important point. Early work comparing Moderna and Pfizer shots highlighted a wide range of responses in the participants. This is reliably missed by most if not all. In other words, there appears no generalisability or predictability around the consent-lite shots.
Meanwhile, negative risk benefit is established, with an ARR of 0.43% and NNV of 217. These numbers indicated by others appear far worse.
Only continued long term study will expose the individual dire consequences of taking the snake-oil, and help determine the individual physiological, genetic and RNA epigenetic variables associated with adverse events and death.
In addition, there are so many other factors in play, highly inflammatory LNPs, inflammatory 'spike' protein, PEG etc... that pertain to the undermining of interferon 1a signalling pathways described by Seneff et al. (2022)
"There needs to be some attempts to add up all the different adverse reactions to give a an overall picture of the % affected..."
That's exactly what should have been done in the long-term trials - oops there weren't any long-term trials. From day one I said I will take the shots after ten years had elapsed, all the side effects were noted, and nobody ever got a common cold again. I'm still waiting on all three requirements.
Thanks brilliantly written... and that reference on BP is very telling? Is there a similar review on menstral
Issues etc and heart issues ?
There needs to be some attempts to add up all the different adverse reactions to give a an overall picture of the % affected...
Dr Aseem M..quotes 1 in 800.. as many as 25% heart related effects...
Although I know of four - five who had heart issues the problem lies in that there are lots of people walking round seemingly not affected?
Therefore it’s hard to raise contest which I think is needed at this point before the next calamity comes... ?
I don't think there is a shortage of information that lays out the effects, potential damage and injury and death from a the biomedical perspective. Then we have Pfizer's own 6mo cumulative report (Feb 2021) and its appendix of >1200 adverse events of special interest. That makes a sound start.
PM studies (Germany and Italy) confirm biomedical hypotheses and observations showing organ effects of auto-inflammatory 'spike' protein. German studies suggest as many as 1:800 may be sickened, though some suggest this may be more like 1:300. Hospital data (ICU, death) in vaxxed / unvaxxed seems self-evident now. SADS, cancers, autoimmune conditions, along with myo/pericarditis in children and younger adults and others ... on and on it all goes.... and all for just what exactly?
Then eventually, having got through all of the above and passed the legion of irregularities associated with mensis and escalating infertility we arrive at excess deaths, seen across countries emboldened by BigPharma and its novel synthetic nucleotide sequence jabs.
Not a good picture to be seen there either.
Now to the important point. Early work comparing Moderna and Pfizer shots highlighted a wide range of responses in the participants. This is reliably missed by most if not all. In other words, there appears no generalisability or predictability around the consent-lite shots.
Meanwhile, negative risk benefit is established, with an ARR of 0.43% and NNV of 217. These numbers indicated by others appear far worse.
Only continued long term study will expose the individual dire consequences of taking the snake-oil, and help determine the individual physiological, genetic and RNA epigenetic variables associated with adverse events and death.
In addition, there are so many other factors in play, highly inflammatory LNPs, inflammatory 'spike' protein, PEG etc... that pertain to the undermining of interferon 1a signalling pathways described by Seneff et al. (2022)
"There needs to be some attempts to add up all the different adverse reactions to give a an overall picture of the % affected..."
That's exactly what should have been done in the long-term trials - oops there weren't any long-term trials. From day one I said I will take the shots after ten years had elapsed, all the side effects were noted, and nobody ever got a common cold again. I'm still waiting on all three requirements.
Such a waste of a life. Actually of several lives. Imagine the adventurers those two would have given children they might have had. Wake up world.
Liked your intelligent article & BOB's cartoon. I believe that eventually we shall see TRUTH & JUSTICE!
All the criminals acting as if they're blind, deaf and brain damaged will be made to pay for their crimes against humanity.
💔💔💔
Illustrative of the terrible tragedy wrought upon us all.
Thanks