Thanks for the humour PM and perhaps also for the brief attention.
One is surrounded by people with multiple beliefs and disbeliefs that may readily defeat binary assessments.
I don't know Aussie17 and have little interest in who that appears to be. Nonetheless, the commentary provided some ventilation for Chris Smith, which struck me as a laudable exercise in the face of widespread social and media narcosis in Australia and New Zealand.
I am inclined toward trying to capture vignettes of truth though I am war wary and weary. As you well know the truth may be the very means of launching another lie or manufacturing another carapace of delusion. And I also realise that it may be just another incremental step in habituating the populace to the acceptance of a very toxic, life shortening narrative.
I sounded the clarion call to our docs that should some accept the assertion that a future iteration of toxic shots receives 'ethical approval' they may quite possibly find themselves in some difficulty. Most appear to adhere to a 'virus' paradigm. That appears an important step in ideological 'divestment'.
In this multi-pronged assault, ignoring the unknown composition of the shots, the self-assembling nano-tech and interaction with 5G or other EM source appears foolhardy. The additional in silico manufacture of a toxic synthetic genetic brew with plasmids and unknown gene insertions (augmented with LNPs) may also unpredictably lead to all manner of undesirable pathologies. The EM/nanotech equation appears a more than likely end game, though once again, when someone is intent on erasing the population of the World, all tools would become a focus of endeavour to this end?
If one divides rather than educates, if one tosses ad hominems over engagement, if one distrusts rather than finds what trust there may be to be found, one wonders whether that is a most productive route toward persuasion? It seems obvious, as I have mentioned before, that a plethora of non-generalisable shots seems a most desirable way in which to conceal underlying purpose and potentially lethal AESIs.
The obvious fact that all these players and their political identities appear useful idiots in the game of destruction that has no side, nor to win nor to lose, but gains ever more by profound division, inequality and exclusion, one then wonders where the real operatives actually lie?
And trust me or not, I do have sound experience of that.
As polite and erudite as ever my pleasure. If I could only type well I might be able to write (is that an oxymoron?). BUT, here is a guy who can write nearly as well as you, or should I say he is in 2nd place to you in my list of wanna write likes:
who basically wrote a reply today I might give you but since he wrote it better, I take a chance to cheat, er I mean be efficient, here it is:
"Nearly every dialectic is intended to serve those who present them. People who believe in viruses also believe "by theory," that they can be stopped by masks. They believe in fairy tales."
The best method for a much smaller, weaker group to control much larger, stronger ones; is to have an effective technique to play the greater powers against each other. Hence the dialectic to which I refer. (The Kabbalist learned a lot from Plato.)
When we hold an equanimity of Mind; that is, equal mindedness, it doesn't matter what lie is presented, if you don't mentally identify with it, the truth becomes unavoidably obvious. The truth points to itself.
(I do not believe in viruses)
To those who polarize the debate about viruses; it wouldn't matter so much if they existed or not, it matters a lot more to them that the Health Freedom effort itself, becomes factionalized and divided into a stratum of opinion camps pitched in opposition to each other. They need everyone to fight each other over who is right. The Information Embargo Cartel would be absolutely terrified if the majority of people really began to notice their methods of public dialectic manipulation.
Science is to the Political Populism Pendulum today, what Religion was to it in ancient times, the only thing that changed was the Social Scaffolding.
More and more people are waking up, and that's probably why the elites are maneuvering so strenuously to create a war, a big war, to make public opinion irrelevant.
Sadly they have. And it appears (for the "elites") a theoretical win-win situation. Who ever wins or loses, leads to a very convenient blood bath, and a war economy driving the expansion of military industrial complex and its ever enlarging power and control.
On the other hand, it remains to be seen whether a sufficient number of people will simply withdraw their social license and submission to governance?
Proton Magic (an op) just disappeared from my screen. If you want a list of those who have banned me it would overlap with paid propaganda operatives on Substack pretty well.
As for Chris the radio announcer, well 2021 (or even 2020) was the time to say that you were wrong. Doing it with no consequences now? He just wants to be on the "good" side and if the "good" side says these vaccines are great he'll jump on to it again.
The cynicism and skepticism may be well placed, and given these uncertain and invidious times, understandable, if not wise. The Australian media 'crack', no matter how ephemeral, incomplete, insipid, or limited, strikes me as an event that may conceivably have opened a few hearts, minds, intellects and eyes. Just one by one, people may be gradually encouraged or alerted to walking away from standing in a terminal queue?
Hey Latus
You have to be pretty obviously an op to get me to spend the time to write about you. Aussie17 is one of those
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/brave-new-world-censorship-agent
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/drs-darling-status-spikes
Thanks for the humour PM and perhaps also for the brief attention.
One is surrounded by people with multiple beliefs and disbeliefs that may readily defeat binary assessments.
I don't know Aussie17 and have little interest in who that appears to be. Nonetheless, the commentary provided some ventilation for Chris Smith, which struck me as a laudable exercise in the face of widespread social and media narcosis in Australia and New Zealand.
I am inclined toward trying to capture vignettes of truth though I am war wary and weary. As you well know the truth may be the very means of launching another lie or manufacturing another carapace of delusion. And I also realise that it may be just another incremental step in habituating the populace to the acceptance of a very toxic, life shortening narrative.
I sounded the clarion call to our docs that should some accept the assertion that a future iteration of toxic shots receives 'ethical approval' they may quite possibly find themselves in some difficulty. Most appear to adhere to a 'virus' paradigm. That appears an important step in ideological 'divestment'.
In this multi-pronged assault, ignoring the unknown composition of the shots, the self-assembling nano-tech and interaction with 5G or other EM source appears foolhardy. The additional in silico manufacture of a toxic synthetic genetic brew with plasmids and unknown gene insertions (augmented with LNPs) may also unpredictably lead to all manner of undesirable pathologies. The EM/nanotech equation appears a more than likely end game, though once again, when someone is intent on erasing the population of the World, all tools would become a focus of endeavour to this end?
If one divides rather than educates, if one tosses ad hominems over engagement, if one distrusts rather than finds what trust there may be to be found, one wonders whether that is a most productive route toward persuasion? It seems obvious, as I have mentioned before, that a plethora of non-generalisable shots seems a most desirable way in which to conceal underlying purpose and potentially lethal AESIs.
The obvious fact that all these players and their political identities appear useful idiots in the game of destruction that has no side, nor to win nor to lose, but gains ever more by profound division, inequality and exclusion, one then wonders where the real operatives actually lie?
And trust me or not, I do have sound experience of that.
As polite and erudite as ever my pleasure. If I could only type well I might be able to write (is that an oxymoron?). BUT, here is a guy who can write nearly as well as you, or should I say he is in 2nd place to you in my list of wanna write likes:
https://substack.com/@nefahotep
who basically wrote a reply today I might give you but since he wrote it better, I take a chance to cheat, er I mean be efficient, here it is:
"Nearly every dialectic is intended to serve those who present them. People who believe in viruses also believe "by theory," that they can be stopped by masks. They believe in fairy tales."
The best method for a much smaller, weaker group to control much larger, stronger ones; is to have an effective technique to play the greater powers against each other. Hence the dialectic to which I refer. (The Kabbalist learned a lot from Plato.)
When we hold an equanimity of Mind; that is, equal mindedness, it doesn't matter what lie is presented, if you don't mentally identify with it, the truth becomes unavoidably obvious. The truth points to itself.
(I do not believe in viruses)
To those who polarize the debate about viruses; it wouldn't matter so much if they existed or not, it matters a lot more to them that the Health Freedom effort itself, becomes factionalized and divided into a stratum of opinion camps pitched in opposition to each other. They need everyone to fight each other over who is right. The Information Embargo Cartel would be absolutely terrified if the majority of people really began to notice their methods of public dialectic manipulation.
Science is to the Political Populism Pendulum today, what Religion was to it in ancient times, the only thing that changed was the Social Scaffolding.
More and more people are waking up, and that's probably why the elites are maneuvering so strenuously to create a war, a big war, to make public opinion irrelevant.
3 World wars have been in the plans for hundreds of years, Albert pike said so himself.
Sadly they have. And it appears (for the "elites") a theoretical win-win situation. Who ever wins or loses, leads to a very convenient blood bath, and a war economy driving the expansion of military industrial complex and its ever enlarging power and control.
On the other hand, it remains to be seen whether a sufficient number of people will simply withdraw their social license and submission to governance?
Proton Magic (an op) just disappeared from my screen. If you want a list of those who have banned me it would overlap with paid propaganda operatives on Substack pretty well.
As for Chris the radio announcer, well 2021 (or even 2020) was the time to say that you were wrong. Doing it with no consequences now? He just wants to be on the "good" side and if the "good" side says these vaccines are great he'll jump on to it again.
The cynicism and skepticism may be well placed, and given these uncertain and invidious times, understandable, if not wise. The Australian media 'crack', no matter how ephemeral, incomplete, insipid, or limited, strikes me as an event that may conceivably have opened a few hearts, minds, intellects and eyes. Just one by one, people may be gradually encouraged or alerted to walking away from standing in a terminal queue?