Les Collaborateurs in New Zealand "healthcare."
Echoes of times past, when self-interest became the awful specter of collusion
Following the revelation that 11,000 exemptions were given to a variety of healthcare workers in New Zealand (Secret Jab Exemptions for Healthcare Workers in New Zealand Come to Light ~ NewZealandDoc Emanuel E. Garcia, M.D.), the entire edifice of alleged ‘vaccine validity’ and ‘pandemic veracity’ has become effectively mute.
The negative-risk benefit, unconsented, uncontrolled, mRNA/plasmid/LNP shots and the sheer weight of their deadly consequence remain a post hoc jab plague visited upon mankind by supra-national and corporate entities, and as we can now see, subverted national politicians, business elite, bureaucrats and Les Collaborateurs in what was once formally known as, “healthcare.”
The Real Hatchet
In a relevant commentary, ‘Guy Hatchard Report’ (October 4, 2023) Hatchard speculated:
The Ministry of Health Granted Vaccine Exemptions to Hundreds Among Its Key Staff
So why did [NZ] senior medical staff choose to remain unvaccinated?
They may have been aware of a 2019 paper in Frontiers in Oncology Journal entitled Gene Therapy Leaves a Vicious Cycle which reported:
“…gene therapy has been caught in a vicious cycle for nearly two decades owing to immune response, insertional mutagenesis, viral tropism, off-target activity, unwanted clinical outcomes (ranging from illness to death of participants in clinical trials), and patchy regulations.”
Despite this evidence of prior harm and the misgivings of senior medical consultants who were in a position to make a reasoned and evidence-based assessment of risk, you may think that the vaccine was in fact safe and effective. It wasn’t, as subsequent research has demonstrated. Incredibly, against the evidence, the government is still encouraging the public to get vaccinated.
The truth appears far simpler
Hatchard speaks to the vanity of the crowd (senior medical consultants ), namely, that a significant number were well aware of the history and the hitherto clinical ‘dead-end’ of mRNA/LNP shots.
May be. But simpler explanations may exist.
Most critical thinking healthcare professionals capable of elementary research appraisal would have noted that controls had been removed upon the granting of emergency authorization. They would also have been carefully watching events and consequences unfold in the UK and elsewhere, where round one and two of the shots were playing out and the growing awareness of the dwindling infection fatality ratio was becoming clear, despite the State media fear promoting propaganda.
Thus, anyone of these with a functioning fraction of a critical brain would have headed (unprompted) for the proverbial hills. Detailed research and knowledge was not necessarily required, and as we still witness today, most appear to remain stunningly ignorant of our current circumstances.
But … with a smidgen of additional interest, the literature was redolent with obvious clues.
For example, the unpredictable utility of shots, ie. Evolution of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody and IgG Avidity Post Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Vaccinations Kevin P. Bliden et al. (2021), “We did observe highly variable immune responses including those with well below average anti-RBD IgG levels and avidity,” that emerged around the same time as the Texas Prison Study which showed, “clinicians and public health practitioners should consider vaccinated persons who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 to be no less infectious than unvaccinated persons.”
However, the devastating clue provided by experts in 2020, acting to advise the Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and the Brighton Collaboration that appears the clincher.
The devastating clue provided by a conference of ‘experts’ in March 2020.
I quote from the paper above:
“The advantages of mRNA vaccines include [the purported] ability to create a highly precise type of protein to elicit the correct antibodies, to elicit T cell responses that are Th1 predominant, and the rapidity of manufacturing.
Of course, disadvantages include the novel nature of both mRNA and DNA vaccines without any licensed vaccine with either technology to date and lack of experience for mass production.”
So, in March 2020, the experts appeared clueless.
Pay attention because it was these “experts” that were allegedly advising two corporate entities, one Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), the other, the Brighton Collaboration (BC).
CEPI was formed from the Gates Foundation, the WEF, and the Wellcome Foundation in late 2016/early 2017. It develops ‘novel vaccines’ chief among which, the novel mRNA/LNP shots with their magical fix of an interchangeable mRNA platform ~ "Disease X" & The Alchemy Of 100 Days (heavily invested and funded by many countries including New Zealand, Australia, UK, Canada etc..) CEPI aims to provide the ultimate jabbing solution to the World. It also includes and funds a “safety platform,” another corporate entity referred to as the Brighton Collaboration (BC) that had once been formed independently in 1999 but was reconstituted as a programme and buried in the Task Force for Global Health in 2019. The history of BC makes telling reading.
Closer to home, and astonishingly published on-line in September 2020: Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies, (Lee et al.), a publication emanating from a distinguished number of chiefly Australian authors from the following institutions:
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity; ARC Centre for Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology, University of Melbourne; Melbourne Sexual Health Centre and Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University; Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Kansas.
All these authors also appeared clueless about how novel experimental gene/LNP shots would come about without evidence.
Going forwards, it will be crucial to evaluate animal and clinical datasets for signs of ADE, and to balance ADE-related safety risks against intervention efficacy if clinical ADE is observed. Ongoing animal and human clinical studies will provide important insights into the mechanisms of ADE in COVID-19. Such evidence is sorely needed to ensure product safety in the large-scale medical interventions that are likely required to reduce the global burden of COVID-19.
Obviously, they had failed to consult their fellow Australian, Prof. Jane Halton, the Chair of the Board of CEPI, who collects roles and titles like confetti and whose intimate knowledge of what was coming would have been scything and crystalline.
No Evidence = No Consent
Not only was this evidence of product safety not available when the mass population jabbing started in the UK in December 2020, neither did any ability to provide informed consent exist.
And why should it?
No one knew anything other than what they were told by BigPharma corporates and funding governments respectively. Both these had serendipitously found themselves in their respective hog-heaven of absolutes; the absolute of financial profit and the absolute of political control. Nothing inconvenient would compromise this perfect storm, one that would quickly become the opportunistic focus of the WEF and WHO, and their gullible ‘reset’.
Informed consent was obviously off the table. And in any case, informed consent was by definition an impossibility in an uncontrolled, running experiment.
Vital articles of the New Zealand Bill of Rights were quietly, deliberately and malevolently erased ~ 8. Right not to be deprived of life; 9. Right not to be subjected to torture or cruel treatment; 10. Right not to be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation; 11. Right to refuse to undergo medical treatment.
Did any of these 11,000 ‘health professionals’ understand any of this in New Zealand? Yep. 11,000 perceived it loud and clear.
In March 2021, much at the same time New Zealand began its mass jabbing campaign an article highlighting the absence of informed consent was published in the literature: Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease. (Timothy Cardozo, Ronald Veazey),
Given the strong evidence that ADE is a non-theoretical and compelling risk for COVID-19 vaccines and the “laundry list” nature of informed consents, disclosure of the specific risk of worsened COVID- 19 disease from vaccination calls for a specific, separate, informed consent form and demonstration of patient comprehension in order to meet medical ethics standards. The informed consent process for on- going COVID-19 vaccine trials does not appear to meet this standard.
Very few if any politicians, business leaders or bureaucrats in New Zealand were paying close intention. The fear laden narrative was designed to occlude the need for consent.
Health workers were not mandated by the New Zealand government driven bureaucratic entities to face a toxic needled barrel until November 2021.
Between December 2020 and November 2021, a process occurred during which a self-selecting group, 11,000 Les Collaborateurs, were able to meaningfully, intentionally and deliberately coalesce to protect themselves. They successfully and quietly isolated themselves from the travesty of massively impaired ethics, and the derailment of the established scientific process, being reasonably well aware of both by now, marooning themselves as pariahs forever New Zealand’s future history.
This revealing farce also potentially exposes all of the Boards and Councils of the HPCA Act as wilful, self-interested compliant bureaucratic servants, singularly bereft of a scintilla of integrity, ethics or scientific process. One is compelled to wonder which boards and councils may have participated in this collaborative act of silent, self-interested preservation when they could have chosen instead to have adhered to established ethics and disrupted the tyrannical social license imposed by the New Zealand government ?
Occam’s razor offers a simpler and more appealing explanation accounting for 11,000 healthcare workers in New Zealand who woke-up enough to silently dodge the Russian Roulette, State sanctioned, kill shot play-off,
…. Les Collaborateurs, one and all.
The simple reasons appear obvious.
Not a single one of the 11,000 in their right mind wanted or would have sought an experimental, uncontrolled polynucleotide/plasmid/LNP cocktail of very uncertain consequence. They were well acquainted with the obvious conclusions above, and in any case, could they possibly go through the farce of consent when informed consent that did not exist? ~ Is New Zealand Ready for Cartwright 2.0?
Rank evil, with apt acronym of DIE ideology permeates every aspect and dimension of the degenerate globalist machinery ~ There is No Solution to the Evil we Face, Because we are dealing with a mystery ~ Thaddeus Kozinski
History silently repeats does it not?