27 Comments

Yup, and guess what? It gets even worse than this! Tune in tomorrow for the next exciting installment of 1984 revisited (again).

Expand full comment
author

Oh no!

Thank you, Ursula.

Expand full comment
Oct 5, 2023Liked by DrLatusDextro

Eleven ton sociopaths with current dissociative amnesia skulking around in the land of the long white cloud doesn’t make for any warm fuzzies. Conscience devoid. Phenomenological cretins. I’d wager if you (NZ) did, we (OZ) did too. It all pains my heart.

Expand full comment

PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol X – Preparing for Power . . . (((SARS-CoV2)))

❝. . . utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases. by want, so that the “Goyim” see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.❞

https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/protocol-x-preparing-for-power-sars

Expand full comment
Oct 6, 2023·edited Oct 6, 2023Liked by DrLatusDextro

An interesting aside is that at least 73,000 NHS staff refused the vaccines, so the mandates were dropped because losing them would have disemboweled the health system in UK.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/jan/31/why-demise-of-vaccine-mandate-plan-for-nhs-staff-was-inevitable

quote: " A senior executive in a trust where 15% of staff were vaccine refuseniks said: “Undoubtedly it will help protect services by avoiding a significant loss of unjabbed staff. But there’s a balance between having staff in post to care for patients and having unjabbed staff in post treating vulnerable patients who are mostly frail, elderly and with compromised health.”

A good question to ask though, is why didn't the other 86% of NZ medical staff not exempted..... think about the very things that the exempted 14% thought important enough to refuse the jab?

Expand full comment
author

As a PhD clinician, it appeared self-evident to me on the grounds of ethics and science (and yes, to use a phrase, "I'm going to have to science the shit out of this," was precisely the point: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7CJrnaauHM

That is what I did, and we all did collectively at NZDSOS https://nzdsos.com/we-are-not-anonymous/. The travesty of ethics was and still remains a terrible and obvious no brainer.

It's hard to know the exact numbers that refused (other than the silent 11,000), but all of us found ourselves bereft of income and practice for a year. Many still cannot practice without shots. Perhaps it may have been as many as 10%?

I would contend (until proved otherwise) that the remaining and larger part of 86% behaved as heavily invested and personally committed, debt laden sheeple and mushrooms, who accepted the Ministry of Health, political and State business narratives, and boxed on, whether taking a chance or in belief that all would be well. For that odious privilege and incredibly uncertain gamble they remained handsomely rewarded.

Expand full comment
Oct 6, 2023·edited Oct 6, 2023Liked by DrLatusDextro

Except those whose health was cut off at the knees because they miscalculated the benefit risk equation.....

But I don't hear too many of them speaking out publicly....

which reminds me... there was and still is a "rumour" that a lot of money has changed hands to parents of vaccine damaged children, and various others, to keep their mouths zipped.

I have zero proof of that. However, with the way this government has acted, nothing would surprise me any more.

Expand full comment
author

Very poor odds to be found when gambling in the established realms of negative risk benefit. As you say, they'll be given toward silence. There's a lot of that about it seems.

Expand full comment
Oct 6, 2023Liked by DrLatusDextro

11000 + additional criminals for whom to arrange life-long forced labour and asset stripping. Every doctor who secretly accepted exemption, without shouting out for the same right for every single human, being is a criminal. Ninety three of those consultants were Canterbury DHB employees. I was told this by the relative of one in mid 2021 but could not get a single name from anyone despite my very best efforts.

Expand full comment
author
Oct 6, 2023·edited Oct 6, 2023Author

Utterly gut wrenching, though not as eviscerating as it was and remains for those sickened and dead, for the legion of people who gave up on ethics and the NZ Bill of Rights, designed to protect corporeal sanctity, who believed politicians, business leaders, institutional leaders, and bureaucrats.

How it must feel for those strutting professionals whose cover is now blown, masquerading for the rest of their lives as they face distrust and perpetual inquisition?

Hard to comprehend on all levels though history perhaps provides a glimpse?

Expand full comment

"How it must feel for those strutting professionals whose cover is now blown, masquerading for the rest of their lives as they face distrust and perpetual inquisition?"

Here in the US the "medical professionals" just don't care. I believe most of the doctors in the US freely chose the bioweapon shots, and if offered an exemption, would have declined. NZ must be quite different. The doctors in the US are ignorant and proud. The covid me-too freakout was just a blip in their continual lives of killing people through standard medical industrial SOPs they all believe in. They have no consciences.

Expand full comment
author
Oct 6, 2023·edited Oct 6, 2023Author

"NZ must be quite different."

Sadly Napoleon, it is not. Not at all.

The vast majority of medical and health professionals across the West including New Zealand and Australia were willingly compliant, conned, or reluctantly coerced, and all were calmed and settled by a few paltry pieces of globalist socialist silver.

Those smart enough to dodge the shots and blackmail the State drove a Faustian bargain by remaining silent. They allowed a very precarious government assault that relied upon the illusion of "social licence" perpetrated by State MSM, doing little but acting in self-interest, although one assumes they will be likely to claim that they acted in the best interests of the public by maintaining their bureaucratic, surgical and medical practices.

Expand full comment
Mar 3·edited Mar 3Liked by DrLatusDextro

Most did line up for the jabs, but I don't see it as a matter of lack of conscience, so much as a surfeit of belief, and trust in "the science." The deep-seated corruption has simply been unfathomable to most people, but is quickly eroding.

But I'm in the US, where mistrust of government and institutions, in general. is evidently more widespread than most "western" (or more properly European colonized) nations. So I don't have a good sense of the extent to which such erosion of trust in the institutions is progressing elsewhere.

Expand full comment
author
Mar 3·edited Mar 4Author

Gotta just smile. Down Under in Sheepleville, a full 70% of the populace bowed (happily) to the shots. The regret and angst now visible is palpable. Perhaps, sufficient will awaken before reaching the proverbial gallows, enough to depose the tyrants and preside over a rebirth of CIVILISATION? One lives in hope.

Here, I specifically do NOT refer to those accredited to UN ECOSOC and defined euphemistically as, "civil" society who should probably be excluded by default.

Expand full comment
Mar 4·edited Mar 23Liked by DrLatusDextro

Indeed, the measures taken by your government - and our neighboring Canada - were absolutely HORRIFYING. Anybody who managed to run the gauntlet without getting any of those toxic jabs in Australia, NZ, Canada, or any of the other states that went full-on fascist is a hero to me.

We had some pockets of such bug-eyed foaming at the mouth lunacy here in the US, but they were relatively isolated, and even in the worst states (akin to provinces, but more autonomous, as I understand it) and cities, people could simply stay out of the fray. The worst were people losing their jobs, especially nurses and hospital staff. There were many protests of such places, in which I participated. And choice had overall popular support.

But a large percentage of us Yanks, probably about 1/3 nationwide even at the height of the lunacy, really DO regard this nation as the "and of the free and home of the brave " I often feel like kissing the ground, though I'm not in one of the more libertarian areas.

I would typically have my mask around my wrist and "forget to put it on," and only rarely would be told to put it on by some shop employee, with only a few isolated terror-stricken lunatics who acted as if I pointed a gun at them. But a lot of places people didn't mind if unmasked people kept their 4 cubits (iron age reference intentional) away.

Expand full comment
Oct 5, 2023Liked by DrLatusDextro

When the jab came out here in NZ...a nurse who was mandated said that the surgeons said...NO WAY..we're not getting it, if we have to we'll all quit....and govt said...OK!

Expand full comment
author
Oct 5, 2023·edited Oct 5, 2023Author

What 'sheeple and mushrooms' fail to realise that they occupy a razor knife edge that sits atop the phenomena of "social license." The NZ government narrative, buoyed and bloated at it is by bribed and coerced MSM diktat is an incredibly fragile entity. And don't the politicians know that!

People on the the other hand appear unwilling to grasp their literal power. Very sad. What 11,000 health professionals did on the other hand, was knowingly grasp their power. Regrettably, their fragmented self-interest also eclipsed their survival instinct. There was really need for that to have happened given the fragility of the narrative. The Air New Zealand pilots are another case in point, as indeed is the collective entity of government groomed NZ "business."

Expand full comment

Excellent! Couldn't have said it better myself.

Expand full comment
Oct 6, 2023Liked by DrLatusDextro

yes Canterbury district health board surgeons. 93 of them. cowards and criminals all.

Expand full comment
author

We had suspected that early on in the charade, now we know for sure, and all the rest too.

Expand full comment

do you know if that number of 93 includes private consultants or were they CDHB consultants working for the dodgy govt.

Expand full comment

How did you find that out Alana?

Up here, one of the prominent surgeons from Waikato hospital who refused the vaccine is still out of work. The hospital keeps ringing him, wanting him back at work, but saying he needs to have the vaccine.

So this doesn't seem to have any even sort of thinking.

Expand full comment

Direct from the source.

Expand full comment
Oct 5, 2023Liked by DrLatusDextro

lining these guilty pos up against the wall is much too good for these scum. I recommend the guillotine as it makes an unforgettable impression on these psychopaths. Do not comply.

Expand full comment
author

In 1789 a French physician and member of the National Assembly named Joseph-Ignace Guillotin was instrumental in passing a law that required all sentences of death to be carried out by “means of a machine.” This was done so that the privilege of execution by decapitation would no longer be confined to the nobles and the process of execution would be as painless as possible.

The first machine was called a louisette, or louison, after its inventor, French surgeon and physiologist Antoine Louis, but later it became known as la guillotine' [and was first used in 1792]. https://www.britannica.com/topic/guillotine#ref193500

Expand full comment
Oct 6, 2023·edited Oct 6, 2023Liked by DrLatusDextro
author
Oct 7, 2023·edited Oct 7, 2023Author

Hardly something to like but there should by now be a growing aversion to pontificating "experts" expounding modelled phlatus in State sponsored disinformation.

Expand full comment