Thanks Latus. The Japanese Dr however reifies the virus in multiple places: viral genes, spike, stimulating immunity, etc. Still doesn't know? there is no-virus. He is a propaganda agent. I like YOUR post though. See you!
Since they cant get humans thru the Van Allen Belts they will likely send Robots to the moon that move around like humans and tell us Mr. A, B, C are in the space suits. We won't be able to see thru the visors while the real astronauts are in low earth orbit on video link that will speak and be shown when in the capsule. Then again, they could just be on the ground in the Kubrick Space Theater. What do I really know though, but I'll have lots of popcorn out.
It seems incomprehensible (or at least difficult to understand) to send the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) that arrived in Mars orbit on March 10, 2006 with a high resolution camera (HiRISE) capable of resolving surface detail at the level of 0.25 to 1.3 m/pixel [30 cm/pixel] https://www.uahirise.org/specs/) covering 1% of the Martian surface during the 2-year Primary Science Phase (PSP) beginning November 2006 (McEwen, A. S., et al. 2007), while apparently dodging a considerably easier and presumably surpassing technical opportunity afforded by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) launched three years later in 2009.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) delivered a wide angle camera that provided imaging to construct a 100-m/pixel lunar global map with incidence angles between 55deg –75deg (except at in polar regions, where incidence angles are always higher). The LRO narrow angle imaging will provide the necessary data (0.5 m/pixel imaging) needed to apply proven techniques to estimate regolith thickness and other key parameters (Robinson MS et al. Space Sci Rev 2010;150: 81–124) see also, https://www.lroc.asu.edu/about/specs
Did I miss something, or did NASA appear to pass up an opportunity to image each Apollo landing site with compelling crystalline clarity?
Thanks Latus. The Japanese Dr however reifies the virus in multiple places: viral genes, spike, stimulating immunity, etc. Still doesn't know? there is no-virus. He is a propaganda agent. I like YOUR post though. See you!
hey, have you noticed the Japanese have supposedly signed up for "Artemis III"...?
;)
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-13295573/Japanese-astronaut-non-American-set-foot-Moon.html
Since they cant get humans thru the Van Allen Belts they will likely send Robots to the moon that move around like humans and tell us Mr. A, B, C are in the space suits. We won't be able to see thru the visors while the real astronauts are in low earth orbit on video link that will speak and be shown when in the capsule. Then again, they could just be on the ground in the Kubrick Space Theater. What do I really know though, but I'll have lots of popcorn out.
I am excited to see "Top Ramen" replace "Tang" and "FoodSticks"...
... but Japanese Kit-Kat will probably rule the day...
A great post. Thank you.
Russ, thank you for reading. If one can poke the bear, prod a few toward greater awareness, job accomplished.
It seems incomprehensible (or at least difficult to understand) to send the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) that arrived in Mars orbit on March 10, 2006 with a high resolution camera (HiRISE) capable of resolving surface detail at the level of 0.25 to 1.3 m/pixel [30 cm/pixel] https://www.uahirise.org/specs/) covering 1% of the Martian surface during the 2-year Primary Science Phase (PSP) beginning November 2006 (McEwen, A. S., et al. 2007), while apparently dodging a considerably easier and presumably surpassing technical opportunity afforded by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) launched three years later in 2009.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) delivered a wide angle camera that provided imaging to construct a 100-m/pixel lunar global map with incidence angles between 55deg –75deg (except at in polar regions, where incidence angles are always higher). The LRO narrow angle imaging will provide the necessary data (0.5 m/pixel imaging) needed to apply proven techniques to estimate regolith thickness and other key parameters (Robinson MS et al. Space Sci Rev 2010;150: 81–124) see also, https://www.lroc.asu.edu/about/specs
Did I miss something, or did NASA appear to pass up an opportunity to image each Apollo landing site with compelling crystalline clarity?