Thanks Latus. The Japanese Dr however reifies the virus in multiple places: viral genes, spike, stimulating immunity, etc. Still doesn't know? there is no-virus. He is a propaganda agent. I like YOUR post though. See you!
It seems incomprehensible (or at least difficult to understand) to send the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) that arrived in Mars orbit on March 10, 2006 with a high resolution camera (HiRISE) capable of resolving surface detail at the level of 0.25 to 1.3 m/pixel [30 cm/pixel] https://www.uahirise.org/specs/) covering 1% of the Martian surface during the 2-year Primary Science Phase (PSP) beginning November 2006 (McEwen, A. S., et al. 2007), while apparently dodging a considerably easier and presumably surpassing technical opportunity afforded by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) launched three years later in 2009.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) delivered a wide angle camera that provided imaging to construct a 100-m/pixel lunar global map with incidence angles between 55deg –75deg (except at in polar regions, where incidence angles are always higher). The LRO narrow angle imaging will provide the necessary data (0.5 m/pixel imaging) needed to apply proven techniques to estimate regolith thickness and other key parameters (Robinson MS et al. Space Sci Rev 2010;150: 81–124) see also, https://www.lroc.asu.edu/about/specs
Did I miss something, or did NASA appear to pass up an opportunity to image each Apollo landing site with compelling crystalline clarity?
Thanks Latus. The Japanese Dr however reifies the virus in multiple places: viral genes, spike, stimulating immunity, etc. Still doesn't know? there is no-virus. He is a propaganda agent. I like YOUR post though. See you!
A great post. Thank you.
It seems incomprehensible (or at least difficult to understand) to send the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) that arrived in Mars orbit on March 10, 2006 with a high resolution camera (HiRISE) capable of resolving surface detail at the level of 0.25 to 1.3 m/pixel [30 cm/pixel] https://www.uahirise.org/specs/) covering 1% of the Martian surface during the 2-year Primary Science Phase (PSP) beginning November 2006 (McEwen, A. S., et al. 2007), while apparently dodging a considerably easier and presumably surpassing technical opportunity afforded by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) launched three years later in 2009.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) delivered a wide angle camera that provided imaging to construct a 100-m/pixel lunar global map with incidence angles between 55deg –75deg (except at in polar regions, where incidence angles are always higher). The LRO narrow angle imaging will provide the necessary data (0.5 m/pixel imaging) needed to apply proven techniques to estimate regolith thickness and other key parameters (Robinson MS et al. Space Sci Rev 2010;150: 81–124) see also, https://www.lroc.asu.edu/about/specs
Did I miss something, or did NASA appear to pass up an opportunity to image each Apollo landing site with compelling crystalline clarity?